Search for: "State v. Childs" Results 4861 - 4880 of 21,041
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:34 am by Diane Marie Amann
Many obituaries will focus on her prodigious and inspiring career in the United States: her journey, from a working-class upbringing in a single-parent family, to practice as a lawyer on child rights and in the Department of Justice, to service, in the District of Columbia Circuit, as the 1st woman Chief Judge of a U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
On December 10, 2018, the British Columbia Law Institute (BCLI) released its final report on the Employment Standards Act review mandated by the government. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
On December 10, 2018, the British Columbia Law Institute (BCLI) released its final report on the Employment Standards Act review mandated by the government. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm by Mark Walsh
Today’s lone case for argument, Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 12:51 pm by rstokes
The following are just a few examples from cases in the state of New York: Tobin v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:32 am by David Super
  The Act's heavy reliance on Medicaid expansion also sought to save federal costs -- with disastrous results after NFIB v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:42 am by Emma Broches, Julia Solomon-Strauss
Ludke was on probation for child sexual assault and threatening a federal judge, and he had removed an ankle location monitoring device before leaving Wisconsin. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
 A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said :   (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
The judge awarded Mr Monir £40,000 in damages and costs, and said in his judgment: “It needs to be stated clearly: Mr Monir is completely innocent. [read post]