Search for: "State v. Church"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 5,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
Family Voices Coordinators participate in several groups within the state, including Title V/CSHCN, DD Council, Part C agency, CHIP board and parent and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:56 am
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 4:16 am
Brian Peterson posts on a fascinating West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals decision involving the use of social media between a juror and defendant and the issue of disclosure of such connections during voir dire.In State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 12:41 pm
A recent decision from the Third Circuit, Arena v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:12 am
This all changed when the highest criminal court in Texas ruled in Beeman v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 12:41 pm
A recent decision from the Third Circuit, Arena v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:10 pm
” Last week in Groff v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm
It is unlikely, however, that judges can be relied upon to step up on this issue in light of the recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
17 Feb 2006, 9:40 am
The discussion in that section of Katzenbach v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL’s efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims – ActionAid’s unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General… [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 11:43 am
The beloved son of a church Elder, Mr. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 2:37 pm
Burwell v. [read post]
Symposium: The Masterpiece ruling calls for increased vigilance of discrimination in the marketplace
7 Jun 2018, 6:30 am
Citing Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye Inc. v Hialeah, the Supreme Court found that the commission violated the First Amendment’s free exercise clause by demonstrating “clear and impermissible hostility” toward Phillips’ religious objections. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 12:02 pm
For instance, in J.S. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 12:14 pm
” Morgenstern v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 877 (1990), and to “communicat[e]” those teachings to others, Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & Sch. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:54 pm
Coker v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:05 pm
UPDATE: Commenter David Schwartz offers a different approach: Betz v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 9:47 am
citing Fallon v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 1:24 pm
Ross v. [read post]
