Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 8,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2009, 3:15 pm
Via the ever-vigilant Hugo Cox and the UK's IPO website comes news of an interesting reference to the Court of Justice of the European Communities for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano (Italy) in Case C-168/09 Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa & Famiglia SpA. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:07 pm
Green card holders live in the United States as our neighbors and serve in our Armed Forces. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:08 am
It is for the tenure holder/person interested to accept it or not. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 7:34 am
Art 8 of GDPR states that if a child is under age of 16 then it requires parental consent but that this default age for lawful consent may be lowered by individual member states down to minimum of 13. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:14 am
C=HOLDINGS B.V. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 3:41 am
For example, in Amgen v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:05 am
Count 2 therefore states a violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 11:02 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:36 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
See Holder v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 7:18 pm
A copyright case from 1993, National Car Rental System, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 10:06 am
Gutierrez, consolidated with Holder v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:32 pm
Holder, 555 U.S. 511 (2009); Gonzales v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:02 am
In Virtual Works, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:47 pm
For example,the judgment in Austero v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 6:49 am
Paul Reinsurance Company, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:30 am
By Jason Rantanen In GlobalTech v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
For example, in Phillips v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:45 am
But if a court can determine that an offer is not FRAND, it presumably could also state wh [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 12:27 pm
As previously reported, in Ross v. [read post]
