Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 8,246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2013, 10:32 am
Since 2000, petitioner was an employment-pass holder in Singapore, where he worked. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Holder, 697 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:33 pm
The decision in question is Case C‑534/10 P Brookfield New Zealand Ltd, Elaris SNC v Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO), Schniga GmbH. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
In a high profile disqualification dispute, Covington & Burling was disqualified in the case of State of Minnesota v. 3M. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:44 pm
Congress is a lost cause, so it will have to be called by the State legislatures (a minimum of two-thirds, or thirty-four States, will be necessary). [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 5:07 pm
The decision does not come as a big surprise, given the general trend followed by courts in the US post the epoch making decision in eBay v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:15 pm
This bill places the ability for determining who may be appointed by the Governor with the political party leadership of the vacating office holder. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 3:39 am
If smartphone and tablet computers become immune to injunction requests only because they incorporate large numbers of features, a whole category of patents (with many subcategories) is devalued in the United States, forcing patent holders to rely on injunction-friendlier jurisdictions abroad.Judge Koh's decision was unprecedented and expected at the same time. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
Some states require the plaintiff to provide a specific trade secret disclosure document before discovery commences. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
Some states require the plaintiff to provide a specific trade secret disclosure document before discovery commences. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:20 pm
” Ball Corp. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:29 pm
v=XCbPFHu3OOc. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
In the Apple v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 10:48 am
” Point Landing, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2012, 12:57 pm
Holder. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:31 am
Chavez v. [read post]
Leiba v. Holder: Aggravated felony bar in INA 212(h) inapplicable to those who were never “admitted”
3 Dec 2012, 6:01 am
Holder. [read post]
Leiba v. Holder: Aggravated felony bar in INA 212(h) inapplicable to those who were never “admitted”
3 Dec 2012, 6:01 am
Holder. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
