Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 19,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The best way to do this is through the extensive literature on state capacity and development, much of it new since Ackerman’s original efforts, to establish a legally plausible baseline for marking out later informal constitutional changes. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 9:04 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Ramayel Cain v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Raven v. [read post]
[David Kopel] Restoring the right to bear arms, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen
9 Aug 2022, 9:19 am
States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:03 am
Marks v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:03 am
Marks v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
Adams v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 73 [week ending on Sunday 22 November] – Xmas present from Benelux PTO | Eponia never ending troubles | Prof Dr Siegfried Broß v EPO | Protection of formats in the Netherlands | Eponia never ending proceedings | UK intensifies its Cracking Ideas programme | Anne Frank's Diary copyright | Transport for London and IP | CJEU in SBS Belgium v SABAM Case… [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:27 am
An earlier post on this blog by Mark Tushnet explained that Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:42 am
(Apparently thinking along similar lines, Mark Koffsky recently proposed using state immunity from patent damages to preempt patent assertions from PAEs in “How States Can Kill Patent Trolls. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 11:35 am
The case is TransCore, LP v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 10:37 am
Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:23 am
This posting was written by Mark Engstrom, Editor of CCH RICO Business Disputes Guide. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 6:49 am
The Delfi v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:58 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 2:56 pm
`(v) Whether the user of the mark or trade name intended to create an association with the famous mark. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
LLC, 173 AD3d 1298, 1303 [3d Dept 2019] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citations omitted]; see Matter of Anonymous v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 195 AD3d 1137, 1138-1139 [3d Dept 2021]). [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
LLC, 173 AD3d 1298, 1303 [3d Dept 2019] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citations omitted]; see Matter of Anonymous v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 195 AD3d 1137, 1138-1139 [3d Dept 2021]). [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
5 years ago, in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:00 am
Therefore a proper allegation of nonuse should state that the marks were not in use as of those later dates. [read post]
