Search for: "State v. So" Results 4861 - 4880 of 117,806
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
"Specification 2 alleged that "on two separate occasions between January 1998 and December 1999," Wolfe "stopped two individuals and confiscated, for personal monetary gain, a quantity of United States currency. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:12 am by traceydennis
R (Ghai) v Newcastle upon Tyne City Council (Ramgharia Gurdwara, Hitchin and others intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 59; [2010] WLR (D) 36 “The aims of the provisions of the Cremation Act 1902 were to ensure that cremations were subject to uniform rules throughout the country, to enable the Secretary of State to regulate the manner and places in which cremations were carried out, to require a crematorium to be a building which was appropriately equipped and to ensure that a… [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:00 am
 So the thing that the Supreme Court implicitly thought would never actually happen does indeed happen in our great state. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 2:15 pm by Brian Evans
Sadly, this is the classic “Finality v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:00 am by Dave Johns, Olswang LLP
Introduction On the 25 February 2016 the UKSC heard Airtours’ appeal of the decision in Airtours Holidays Transport Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC [2014] EWCA Civ 1033. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:24 am
Most bankruptcy cases attempting to avoid foreclosure are cases involving mortgage debt, not judgment debt, so the circumstances and defenses were different in Walters v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The questions for the Supreme Court were firstly whether it is unlawful for the Secretary of State to exercise his power to provide MLA so as to supply evidence to a foreign state that will facilitate the imposition of the death penalty in that state on the individual and secondly whether it is lawful under the Data Protection Act 2018, Part 3 for law enforcement authorities in the UK to transfer personal data to law enforcement authorities abroad for… [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 3:03 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Carnwath stated that the CJEU said producing a plan complying with art 23(1) did not itself mean the member state had met its obligations under art 13, and it was for the national court to take “any necessary measure” so that the authority establishes a plan required by the Directive when there had been a failure to comply with art 13 and lack of application to postpone the deadline under art 22. [read post]