Search for: "v. " Results 4861 - 4880 of 493,769
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2007, 2:12 am
Lawntown Ltd v Camenzuli and another [2007] EWCA Civ 949 “Where the court was exercising its discretion under s 610(2) of the Housing Act 1985 to decide whether to vary a restrictive covenant to permit conversion of a single dwelling house into flats where planning permission had been granted there was no presumption, let alone duty, in favour of varying the covenant. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 8:18 am
Regina v Al-Ali; [2008] WLR (D) 302 “When granting leave to a prosecutor to appeal from a ruling of a trial judge in the Crown Court, the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) should look rather more widely at the interests of justice than simply considering whether the appeal had a realistic prospect of success because even if the judge's ruling were held to be wrong it would only be if it were in the interests of justice that an order should be made to resume the trial or to… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 12:55 pm by Christine Hurt
So, the long-awaited Supreme Court argument in Skilling v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 8:25 am
Newport City Council v Charles; [2008] WLR (D) 245 “A local authority's right to possession against a person succeeding to a tenancy on the death of a family member other than a spouse on the ground that the accommodation was more than he reasonably required was not an interest in land capable of giving rise to a proprietory estoppel against the tenant. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:36 am
R (Heffernan) v Rent Service; [2008] WLR (D) 279 “Rent officers, in identifying the ‘locality’ under Sch 1, Pt I to the Rent Officers (Housing Benefit Functions) Order 1997, as amended, needed to assemble only enough ‘neighbourhoods’ to satisfy the requirements of para 4(6)(c). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:43 am by traceydennis
Regina v Magro and others [2010] EWCA Crim 1575; [2010] WLR (D) 176 “Although a five-judge constitution of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) had a discretion to decide that a previous decision of that court should not be treated as a binding decision when it was wrong, it was not entitled to disregard or deprive the only decision of a three-judge constitution of the court of its authority on a distinct and clearly identified point of law, reached after full argument and close… [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 2:31 am
Power to exclude evidence of probative value Regina v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:41 am by Kate Fort
The Sixth Circuit dismissed the Harvest Institute Freedman Federation’s claim against the Cobell v. [read post]