Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 191,912
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2024, 6:18 am
In a highly publicized and widely discussed case, Mata v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:02 am
In respect of unfair advantage, the Court noted that, following L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV (C-487/07), what it was concerned with was whether Aldi had attempted to take advantage of, or ride on the coat tails of the Mark, in order to exploit it and gain a benefit from its reputation and Thatchers' marketing efforts which have been made by Thatchers.It would also suffice if the objective effect of Aldi's use was to enable it to benefit from… [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* See Matter of DeFazio v DiNapoli, 211 AD3d 1254, and Matter of Frederick v New York State Comptroller, 204 AD3d 1292.** See Matter of Pirrone v Town of Wallkill, 6 AD3d 447, in which the Appellate Division addressed the recommendation of a hearing officer's finding that the individual was required to undergo spinal fusion surgery or forfeit General Municipal Law §207-c disability retirement benefits. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* See Matter of DeFazio v DiNapoli, 211 AD3d 1254, and Matter of Frederick v New York State Comptroller, 204 AD3d 1292.** See Matter of Pirrone v Town of Wallkill, 6 AD3d 447, in which the Appellate Division addressed the recommendation of a hearing officer's finding that the individual was required to undergo spinal fusion surgery or forfeit General Municipal Law §207-c disability retirement benefits. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
In 2002, in Ashcroft v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:46 am
But the legal outcome could not have been more different. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Much has been written about the Court’s uneasy—to put it mildly—relationship with precedent. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am
The consultation is available to read here, though the associated responses have not yet been published. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 12:58 am
The Cohabitation Rights Bill, which has been proposed in various forms over the years, aims to address some of the gaps in the current legal framework. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 12:11 am
The plaintiffs lose.The case is Reese v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
After the judge granted the tenant’s motion to dismiss, an appeal followed.The Appellate Term, Second Department, was of the view that prior to these tenants taking occupancy of the unit back in 2018, the preceding tenant’s rent was $2,229.89, and the owner, upon that’s earlier tenant’s vacancy, incorporated apartment improvements (including relocating perimeter walls), such that the unit’s rent was legitimately increased to $3100Since, at the time, the governing… [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
The Commitment Rule is a further development of the proposal we submitted to the Secretariat of UNCITRAL Working Group V (Insolvency) in an open letter on September 14, 2023. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Madison has been recited thousands of times. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:54 pm
Department of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
How do the NetChoice cases relate to Murthy v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:29 pm
Coast Specialty Surgery Ctr. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:13 pm
A recent New York Appellate Division, First Department case—Marte v Tishman Constr. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 3:21 pm
See Bridges v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
