Search for: "Born v. Born" Results 4881 - 4900 of 7,509
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2013, 7:26 am by The Charge
  That case is pending in the Supreme Judicial Court under the caption Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 1:21 am
Even the ambiguous wording of Article 14 of the Enforcement Directive ("Member States shall ensure that reasonable and proportionate legal costs and other expenses incurred by the successful party shall, as a general rule, be borne by the unsuccessful party, unless equity does not allow this. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Where a spouse or child has been intentionally or unintentionally omitted under a will, the spouse or child (including adopted children or those born out-of-wedlock) are entitled to claim recapture rights. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Where a spouse or child has been intentionally or unintentionally omitted under a will, the spouse or child (including adopted children or those born out-of-wedlock) are entitled to claim recapture rights. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd Jassin
  Where a spouse or child has been intentionally or unintentionally omitted under a will, the spouse or child (including adopted children or those born out-of-wedlock) are entitled to claim recapture rights. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:41 am by Daniel Richardson
By Daniel RichardsonCity of Montpelier v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 06176(2d Dept.,2021) the parties were the parents of a child, who was born in December 2009. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
On this presumption, it was observed by the Supreme Court in Goutam Kundu (supra)"It is a rebuttable presumption of law that a child born during the lawful wedlock is legitimate, and that access occurred between the parents. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 8:32 am by Eugene Volokh
A very interesting decision handed down Wednesday by a New York appellate court (Weisberger v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:39 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today (Tong v. [read post]