Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 8,123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am
” At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief, as well as the issues at stake more broadly, in next Term’s North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:46 am
Phelps), and false claims to possess the Medal of Honor (United States v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:28 pm
SPRAWLDEF et al. v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 11:56 am
But they note that the Court’s five-four decision in Vance v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:00 am
It's that time again... time to check in on the week's news in Suits by Suits: The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued its opinion in Velazquez-Perez v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:00 am
During “Public Private Partnerships: Smooth Sailing or Choppy Waters in the Wake of the Elizabeth River Crossings and VDOT v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
The alleged “architect” had much to say about a national legislature and a national judiciary, but very little to say about a national executive: “I have scarcely ventured as yet to form my opinion either of the manner in which it ought to be constituted or of the authorities with which it ought to be cloathed,” he confessed.[2]During the Convention, he did not play a leading role in fashioning the executive branch. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:16 am
Savage reports that “the State Department pushed to side with the bank, while the Justice and Treasury Departments wanted the executive branch to stay out of the dispute. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am
Canada,[6] Fish J. clearly stated that solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege were not two branches of the same tree. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am
The first guerrilla organizers were dissident army officers, appalled by their country’s subservience to U.S. interests, and then university intellectuals, shut out of electoral politics by state repression of the left. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
20 May 2014, 3:33 pm
University of State of N.Y. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:31 am
The more state-protective Justices have argued, for example in footnote 9 of Garcia v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
They feared it would set a disastrous higher lawmaking precedent: After all, requiring the abolition of poll taxes in federal, but not state, elections represented a relatively minor incursion on state sovereignty. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:51 pm
No, West Virginia’s highest court said last week, in State v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:18 am
United States, “which certainly seems possible based on the oral argument, it will cap off a terrible decade for the Executive Branch in foreign relations cases before the Supreme Court. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:35 am
United States. [read post]
15 May 2014, 12:24 pm
Guardsmark had employed Bowman since 1993, and in 2005 he became the manager in charge of its San Francisco branch. [read post]
15 May 2014, 12:05 pm
” In particular, the provision instructed the executive branch to examine the extent to which a transferred detainee might become eligible for: relief from removal pursuant to the Convention Against Torture; release from immigration detention, including pursuant to the Supreme Court’s Zadvydas v. [read post]
