Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 13,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2008, 5:41 pm
In the case of McElwee v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 5:41 pm
In the case of McElwee v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:16 am
Also, the advantages of bringing a centralised opposition before the European Patent Office instead of national tribunals were obvious ([57]). [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 4:54 am
Then maybe a big step would be an overhaul of the Administrative Office of the Courts. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 2:29 am
The Regional Court in Cologne in a de novo action by the Respondent in XM Satellite Radio Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
In its 2001 decision Whitman v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 7:25 am
Sylla Bangaly v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:10 am
Ayala noted that her determination may be appealed by application to the Personnel Review Board or in accordance with Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules. * The courts have ruled that the appointing authority may impose a harsher penalty than the penalty recommended by a disciplinary hearing officer [see Alamio v Ambach, 91 AD2d 695 and Henry v Village of Palmyra, 105 AD2d 1159 for examples of such actions and the standards to be followed in such… [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 9:35 am
The Court heard argument on Monday in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Although ERS again denied Sears' request for Tier 2 membership, Sears challenged the decision via an administrative hearing and the Hearing Officer recommended Sears' application for retroactive Tier 2 membership be granted. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Although ERS again denied Sears' request for Tier 2 membership, Sears challenged the decision via an administrative hearing and the Hearing Officer recommended Sears' application for retroactive Tier 2 membership be granted. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 11:58 am
In today’s case (Mainstream Canada v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:44 am
In Peterson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:19 am
The court sent a similar case, O’Connor-Ratcliff v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 2:38 pm
For example, Wyeth v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:00 am
Delhi Administration AIR 1963 SC 1572; Indian Bank Vs. [read post]
9 May 2019, 12:06 pm
Defendant Disagreed with Warrantless Entry The New Jersey Supreme Court decided State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am
The Court held that the proper standard was applied and that administrators had reasonable grounds to suspect that a search of E.K.P. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:41 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:09 pm
Two joined appeals, one on behalf of Ms Ali and one on behalf of Ms Ibrahim, came before the Court of Appeal on whether findings of fact made by a review officer under s. 202 of the Housing Act 1996 and the subsequent right of appeal to the County Court under s. 204 were compatible with Article 6 of the ECHR and particularly the ECtHR decision in Tsfayo v UK [2006] ECHR 981. [read post]
