Search for: "Davis v. State"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 6,177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2010, 10:22 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently dismissed the appeal in Comer v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:22 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently dismissed the appeal in Comer v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 8:40 pm
Birke v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:37 am
Michelle Davis won in State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
Berghuis v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:13 am
Davis Download Fincher v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 10:20 am
No Pet Policy Does Not Violate State or Federal Fair Housing Acts Hawn v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:27 am
See Nguyen v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 2:21 pm
See Davis v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:42 am
Turning back to a 1994 ruling, in Davis v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 9:55 pm
Here is the abstract: This paper argues that the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in FEC v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 11:33 am
United States to Al-Haramain v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 5:49 am
” In response, the prosecutor stated that “There’s no evidence that it improperly influenced the jury,” Davis said. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:42 pm
Hill v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:21 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0651, 2010 MT 120N, JERALD DAVIS COCKRELL, Petitioner and Appellant, v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am
Jonathan Chait bemoans the current state of the Supreme Court nomination and confirmation process at the New Republic, describing Kagan as embodying the “state-of-the-art modern Supreme Court nominee” – a young candidate with no record of legal opinions but with strong connections to the establishment of the party in power. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:15 am
The procedure in that case, Burnham v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:22 am
Davis and Bryan A. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:53 am
The Supreme Court's 1993 ruling in Herrera v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 7:03 pm
The application also argued that the Arizona scheme is invalid under the Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling in Davis v. [read post]
