Search for: "Defendant Doe 2"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 40,582
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2017, 10:18 am
And the following answer is retrieved: “To establish a prima facie case of negligence, a plaintiff must prove four elements: (1) a duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff, (2) a breach of that duty, (3) causation, and (4) damages. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:06 am
§ 1125(c)(2). [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:39 am
Claiming that defendants fired him because he is a white American, plaintiff sues both entities under Title VII. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:54 am
" This does not support plaintiff's case, either. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 1:09 pm
Pursuant to Correction Law § 168–a(2)(d), certain defendants convicted of sex offenses in other jurisdictions must register as sex offenders in New York as in People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:55 am
Participate in all proceedings, except to the testimony given during the investigation stage by the defendant who does not defend. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:42 pm
SCOV says that the statute does not include a provision to amend subsequent convictions, and they choose not to read it so broadly as to create a power to do that. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:59 am
Clarifying that a prima facie case of disparate-treatment age discrimination can be established using statistical evidence, even where that evidence does not account for the defendant’s legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for the discharge, the Ninth Circuit, nevertheless, affirmed the dismissal on summary judgment of a case brought by two discharged on-air reporters (Schechner v KPIX-TV, May 29, 2012, Fletcher, B). [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:37 pm
On appeal, the defendant argued that mandatory lifetime monitoring under MCL 750.520b(2)(d) only applies to individuals convicted of CSC-I where the victim is under 13 years old. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 12:12 pm
The defendant now stands charged with violating VTL 1192(2) and 1192(3). [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
Nor does it follow that the test is a purely quantitative one. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:51 am
The defendant can be any provider of medical services, which includes not only doctors and nurses, but also medical corporations, hospitals, clinics, and managed care companies. 2. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 8:57 am
It appeared in the January 2 issue. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 4:23 am
The defendant was trying to violate the plaintiff's rights, or was acting with reckless indifference to those rights. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:42 am
§ 1692(e), (e)(2)(A), (e)(5), and (e)(10). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 11:43 am
These landing pages are allegedly inaccessible to anyone who does not view the advertisements or are deleted after a few weeks or months to avoid detection. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:08 am
What the defendant was accused of doing was throwing the substance in the air. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 12:53 pm
Please note: photo does not depict cast member of Storage Wars.) [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am
In this context, the plaintiff was required to substantiate two key elements: 1) protectable ownership interest in the mark; and (2) the defendant’s use of the mark is likely to cause consumer confusion. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:29 am
On defendants’ appeal, the District Court Judge declined to adopt the Magistrate Judge’s order regarding incarceration:[T]he court does not find it appropriate to Order Defendant Pappas incarcerated for future possible failure to comply with his obligation to make payment of an amount to be determined in the course of further proceedings. [read post]
