Search for: "Degree v. United States" Results 4881 - 4900 of 6,520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
This hotly-contested change aligns the United States with the way the rest of the world determines priority for patent rights among competing applications filed by different inventors for the same invention. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
This hotly-contested change aligns the United States with the way the rest of the world determines priority for patent rights among competing applications filed by different inventors for the same invention. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 6:54 am by Neil Siegel, guest-blogging
Maryland and recently reaffirmed by a majority of Justices in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 11:10 am by Robert Oszakiewski
Honda as ". . .a comprehensive bill to promote the development and responsible stewardship of nanotechnology in the United States . . . . [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:36 am by Matthew Flinn
In Edwards v United Kinghdom (2002) 35 EHRR 19, it said only that: …there must be a sufficient element of public scrutiny of the investigation or its results to secure accountability in practice as well as in theory. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 2:48 pm by Ken
That doesn’t mean “within the territory of the United States.” Not all murders in the United States are federal crimes. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm by Bexis
United States, 1990 WL 124496, at *3 (9th Cir. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm by Laurence Tribe
The right to decline unwanted medical interventions, a right ensured to a limited degree by Cruzan v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 11:21 pm
Certainly—and as I acknowledge in the book—there are places and times in which international human rights law itself has wavered since 9/11 including in the A v United Kingdom decision of the ECtHR—but by and large it has demonstrated more resilience than one might have expected. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm by John Kroger - Guest
John has devoted his entire life to public service as a United States Marine, federal prosecutor, public policy expert, and teacher. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 9:52 am
Chris Torrero was the first of a number of folk to prod this Kat into writing about the Myriad gene patent ruling in the Unites States. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:10 am by Fiona de Londras
Certainly—and as I acknowledge in the book—there are places and times in which international human rights law itself has wavered since 9/11 including in the A v United Kingdom decision of the ECtHR—but by and large it has demonstrated more resilience than one might have expected. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:48 am by Douglas NeJaime
Joey Fishkin’s post on Jack’s book poses a fascinating and provocative question: “Is this book really about faith in something like the project of the United States — its ideals, its promise, its commitments, its possible future redemption — rather than just the Constitution? [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
  Meanwhile, here in the United States, foreign issuers continue to be sued despite the Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]