Search for: "Doe VI"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 5,651
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2010, 4:11 pm
Yet their struggles seem no easier than the Na'vi's. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:11 pm
Yet their struggles seem no easier than the Na'vi's. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
SEBI does not control and regulate life insurance policies. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:34 pm
While Pulley properly contends that § 3553(a)(6) does not allow unwarranted sentencing disparities between co-defendants, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:06 am
The constitutional challenge to the law will likely be that it is preempted by existing federal immigration law, and therefore violates the Supremacy Clause of Article VI, but the constitutional question is far from clear.The new Arizona law aims to assist in enforcement of federal laws against illegal immigration. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 6:34 pm
VI. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 8:23 pm
(b) AN INSURED'S KNOWLEDGE OF ORDINARY WARRANTY OR PUNCH LIST SERVICE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE FOR THE PURPOSES OF PARAGRAPH (a) THIS SUBSECTION (2).The bill, as originally introduced, made void both "Montrose" and "super-Montrose" exclusions. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 7:17 am
(vi) Without prejudice to provisions governing the disclosure of price sensitive information, the disclosure of Non-Material Transactions approved notwithstanding the negative opinion of the independent directors, at least on a quarterly basis, with the simultaneous publication of the negative opinion. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm
Although there is a provision that filing a claim just to avoid deportation will not be allowed, it does not take a genius to figure out that this statute will lead to a lot more suits and that "protection" against suits filed for that purpose is feeble to non-existent.One of the aims of the legislation is certainly laudable, to provide a counter-balance to those unscrupulous employers who hire illegal aliens, take advantage of them and use either actual immigration… [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 12:51 am
This dialogue between Socrates and sophist Antiphon can be found in Xenophon’s Memorabilia (Book I, Part VI): Antiphon. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:35 am
VI, § 3, ¶ 4). [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 2:19 am
Check the map at the website here.In addition to yours truly, the TTABlogger, the hosts of Meet the Bloggers VI are Marty Schwimmer of the Trademark Blog, Ron Coleman of Likelihood of Confusion, and Pamela Chestek of Property, intangible.Lucky's is a little difficult to find, since it does not have outdoor signage. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm
In such cases, petitioners must notify the Commission of their intent to rely on materials previously submitted.Such reliance does not affect petitioners’ obligation to demonstrate that they meet all requirements of this paragraph as required by subparagraph (B)(ii). [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
Accordingly, the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request is novel vis-à-vis document D7. [2.3.2] The Board does not agree with the respondents’ submissions that the skilled person reading document D7 would deduce that FOS and/or inulin were the active ingredients merely because they were specifically mentioned in the composition, whereas the other ingredients were mentioned in more generic terms, or because they would arrive at that conclusion by default… [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 7:58 am
-vis the airline industry? [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 1:28 pm
If the patentee surrendered by argument, he must clearly and unmistakably argue that his invention does not cover certain subject matter to overcome an examiner's rejection based on prior art. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
One’s position may depend on one’s status vis-a-vis TM law. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
But that does not attempt to account for the effect on later changes in the Court. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm
As with his analysis of Halteren vis-à-vis claim 1 of the ‘231 patent, ALJ Rogers found that Halteren did in fact disclose the second-level connection, and, accordingly, that ADI had raised a substant [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:29 am
So what exactly does this mean? [read post]
