Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2012, 11:40 am
Anderson v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:39 am
He stated: “I accept that there is scope for argument on the issue of subsistence. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:59 am
Supreme Court amicus brief on behalf of UNHCR in Negusie v Mukasey, an asylum case on which IntLawGrrl Jaya Ramji-Nogales has posted. [read post]
9 May 2012, 2:51 am
" If there is any consolation to be had, Roberts believes, it is the lack of success they have at fulfilling their stated goals. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
(i) Stanford International Bank Limited (acting by its joint liquidators) (Appellant) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Respondent); and (ii) Stanford International Bank (acting by its joint liquidators) (Respondent) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Appellant) (Oral Hearing) Earlier this year, the Supreme Court heard a complex dispute arising from the collapse of Stanford International Bank (“SIB”) in early 2009. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:00 am
Originally published in Italian (2007), the book has been translated to English by Thomas V. [read post]
7 May 2012, 7:00 am
This piece is in response to Rosalind English’s post on this blog arguing that in M.S. v United Kingdom the European Court extended to far the ambit of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which protects against torture, and inhuman or degrading treatment. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm
Peart v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 568 Court ignored key factors in “foreign criminal” deportation case. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:03 am
Burkhard Hess: “Staatenimmunität und ius cogens im geltenden Völkerrecht: Der Internationale Gerichtshof zeigt die Grenzen auf” – the English abstract reads as follows: This article deals with the decision of the International Court of Justice in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 10:46 am
I didn’t cite the relevant case, he says: U.S. v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:37 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
English cases in this category included: Smith v ADFVN ([2008] EWHC 1797 (QB)); Clift v Clarke [2011] EWHC 1164 (QB); and El Diwany v Hansen and Others ([2011] EWHC 2077 (QB)) . [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:19 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:19 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:38 am
As a result, and as was the case in Elliott v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:44 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:00 pm
” Gilmer v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (in English translation):A method for controlling phytopathogenic harmful fungi, characterised in that the fungi or the materials, plants, the soil or seeds to be protected against fungal attack are treated with an effective amount of a compound of formula I wherein X is C1-C12 alkylene or C2-C12 alkenylene, where the carbon chains may be interrupted by one or two heteroatoms selected from the group consisting of S, O and NR1 , R1 is… [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:23 am
For example, in the case of Maldonado v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:01 pm
Therefore, it has to be established whether this use, which constitutes a method for treatment of the human body by surgery or therapy, confers novelty to the claimed subject-matter.[3.2] According to A 54(4), it is possible to acknowledge the novelty of a “… substance or composition, comprised in the state of the art, for use in a method referred to in A 53(c), provided that its use for any such method is not comprised in the state of the art” (emphasis… [read post]
