Justia Blawg Search - Law Blogs, Lawyer Blogs, Legal Blogs Directory & Search Engine

Regina (Windsor and Maidenhead Royal Borough Council) v East Berkshire Magistrates’ Court – WLR Daily

26 Oct 2010, 4:11 am by michael

Regina (Windsor and Maidenhead Royal Borough Council) v East Berkshire Magistrates’ Court [2010] WLR(D) 264 “Whether an article was a ‘knife’ within the meaning of s 141A(2)(a) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 was not a pure question of fact, but a question of mixed fact and law; and the justices had erred in law in finding that s 141A did not apply to a grapefruit knife, notwithstanding that it was a cutting instrument consisting of a blade with a handle. [read post]

Current Awareness Weblog - http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com

Simple assault is defined as attempting to cause or purposely, knowingly or recklessly causing bodily injury to another; or attempting by physical menace to put another in fear of imminent serious bodily injury

25 Oct 2010, 4:00 pm by PaulKostro

V. [read post]

NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues

Terroristic threats is threatening to commit any crime of violence with the purpose to terrorize another

25 Oct 2010, 3:57 pm by PaulKostro

V. [read post]

NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues

A motion for reconsideration is designed to seek review of an order based on the evidence before the court on the initial motion, not to serve as a vehicle to introduce new evidence in order to cure an inadequacy in the motion record

25 Oct 2010, 2:35 pm by PaulKostro

SUTER V. [read post]

NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues

When the child’s biological parent resists termination of parental rights, it is the court’s function to decide whether the parent can raise the child without causing harm

25 Oct 2010, 2:31 pm by PaulKostro

” Parham v. [read post]

NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues

Due process requires that, in order for a forum state to exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant, the defendant must have minimum contacts with the forum such that maintenance of the lawsuit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and sub

22 Oct 2010, 3:51 pm by PaulKostro

V. [read post]

NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues

Judge corrected for merging both Carroll County judicial districts

22 Oct 2010, 3:16 pm by Harry Styron

But in 2010, for reasons not explained in the Arkansas Supreme Court’s opinion, Parker v. [read post]

Ozarks Law & Economy - http://olp09.wordpress.com

Matrix Media Update – 22 October 2010

22 Oct 2010, 9:56 am by INFORRM

Bath and North East Somerset Council v IC EA/2010/0045. [read post]

Inforrm's Blog - http://inforrm.wordpress.com

When parties to a contract have not agreed in respect of a term that is essential to a determination of their rights and duties, a term that is reasonable in the circumstances is supplied by the court

22 Oct 2010, 9:24 am by PaulKostro

See Capanear v. [read post]

NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues

Writ of Mandamus - Nature and ambit: Supreme Court explains

21 Oct 2010, 10:15 am by The Legal Blog

V .R. [read post]

The Legal Blog.in - http://www.legalblog.in/

A state court lacks authority to compel a federal agency to comply with a subpoena

21 Oct 2010, 8:21 am by PaulKostro

V. [read post]

NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues

Ghailani and the Contradictions of U.S. Detention Policy

21 Oct 2010, 3:05 am by Guest Blogger

For years, these detentions were not reviewed by any court; today, they are subject to habeas corpus review under the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

Elbow Fracture Case Settles for $1,650,000 under High-Low Agreement after Verdict for $4,370,000

21 Oct 2010, 2:12 am by John Hochfelder

The ensuing lawsuit, Espinal v. 1157 East 156th Street LLC (Supreme Court, Bronx County; Index # 20189/05), came to trial in May 2010. [read post]

New York Injury Cases Blog - http://www.newyorkinjurycasesblog.com/

As a general rule, the filing of a divorce complaint fixes the marriage end date for purposes of determining what property will be eligible for distribution

20 Oct 2010, 11:42 am by PaulKostro

Painter v. [read post]

NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues

Before determining that a party is entitled to equitable distribution of an asset simply because it was not included in a PSA, the judge is required to decide whether such a result is fair and just under all the circumstances

20 Oct 2010, 11:39 am by PaulKostro

Addesa v. [read post]