Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 11,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2008, 12:07 pm
The article cited State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 9:40 am
Retail Serv., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:55 am
Articles on Family Law and English Private International Law A few short articles on various aspects of private... [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 6:29 am
Rev. 581 (2006):All deliberate speed, the remedial formula adopted in Brown v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:25 am
In the course of the judgment the court quoted a nice passage from a 1970 English case John v Rees: “As everybody who has anything to do with the law well knows, the path of the law is strewn with examples of open and shut cases which, somehow, were not; of unanswerable charges which, in the event, were completely answered; of inexplicable conduct which was fully explained; of fixed and unalterable determinations that, by discussion, suffered a change. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:26 am
A press release in English is available here. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 10:08 pm
Reg. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
He also dies the term before the Supreme Court hears arguments and decides FCC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:39 am
Some seem to think they are a nightmare, whilst others, such as Andrew Woolley, are calling them 'a victory for plain English'. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 7:41 pm
Carr, which led to Gray v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 12:12 pm
The English common law rule at the time of the Framing was that the defendant must prove self-defense by a preponderance of the evidence, and the Supreme Court has held (Martin v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 10:17 am
Bush and Rasul v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
• Saipem v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:16 am
Star Trucks v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 2:23 pm
” Also of note, Lord Neuberger observes: that the decision of the Court of Human Rights in Cosic v Croatia appears to be inconsistent with the most recent House of Lords authority, Doherty v Birmingham City Council [2008] UKHL 57 and seems to have put the onus back on the English courts to ensure that Article 8 is properly taken into account in possession proceedings. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 3:44 pm
In the recent English case of Cart & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Upper Tribunal & Ors [2009] EWHC 3052 (Admin), this argument was run by Government and rejected by the court. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 8:34 am
Nor does it appear that Aikenhead J was referred to either Wallace v Manchester CC (1998) 30 HLR 1111, English Churches Housing Group v Shine [2004] HLR 42 or Earle v Charalambous [2007] HLR 8. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 6:13 am
" Likewise, Rosenblatt v. [read post]
