Search for: "FRIDAY v. STATE" Results 4881 - 4900 of 7,164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2006, 7:08 am
However, there is little doubt that, if this were to have been a matter of US v EU (as opposed to EU v US), the US would be breaking down the EU's door.I have seen criticism of the ban by UK officials:Britain's culture secretary on Friday compared the U.S. crackdown on online gambling to the failed alcohol ban of Prohibition as she prepared to host an international summit on Internet gambling next week. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
” The Justices agreed on Friday to rule on the case of King v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:48 am by Broc Romanek
The SEC is seeking a rehearing because the same court granted en banc rehearing in American Meat Institute v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Plaintiffs in the federal Atlantic Yards eminent domain case were rejected in June 2008, though one justice, the conservative Samuel Alito stated that he would've granted the petition.As I wrote at the time, a decision to reject does not mean that the cases below were decided correctly, just that the appeal didn't present enough issues of law--conflicts in the interpretation of the Supreme Court's highly contested 6/23/05 Kelo v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:34 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and John V. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:43 am
 They've already posted an employment law case, Kasten v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:51 pm by CJLF Staff
  Six people were arrested last Friday in connection to the tunnel. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:05 pm
Supreme Court in District Attorney's Office for Third Judicial Dist. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:54 am by Steve Hall
"The state corrective process as a whole was ineffective," Brandt said.The opinion in Balentine v. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 10:32 am by Shea Denning
That instruction now includes a note well advising of the ruling in State v. [read post]