Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 67,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 8:26 am
Pardon the Jimi Hendrix allusion, but it seemed appropriate given yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 7:06 am
An example of how some of it works is explained in the case, Lilith Brainard, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 6:39 pm
The UCCJEA was recently at the forefront in Dalessio v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 7:22 am
Advanced Oral Technologies, L.L.C v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:29 am
In Soppet v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 5:49 am
” In Husk v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:56 am
The applicant’s appeal succeeded because evidence was given by a prosecution witness which should not have been put before the jury. [read post]
7 May 2023, 7:42 am
The absence of a specific demand is unsurprising given that Senator Warren lacks direct regulatory authority over Amazon in this matter. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 5:27 am
MTP v. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 6:59 am
In Part V, I talked about the legal framework of foreign service businesses in China. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
When a judicial review was brought against the decision of a misconduct hearing panel, the defendant was the chief constable of that force: see R (Gannon) v Chief Constable of Merseyside [2009] EWHC 2133 (Admin) and R (Evans) v Chief Constable of Sussex [2011] EWHC 2329 (not available on Bailii or ICLR). [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:26 pm
Akamai v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:13 am
See, e.g., NFD v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm
defense is "too much time" given that exposure, or that we should be looking to rush through things like this. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:24 pm
Which, given the definition, is to ask whether it's a "building".You can see why there might be some debate here. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 2:09 pm
To hold that there's no duty would be a bigger problem than a rule that admits that there's a duty and that just hopes that we can get the truthful testimony we need to figure out who, if anyone, is liable in a given setting.In short, Justice Premo's opinion is right. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm
Given the need for speed, perhaps counsel should be held to the fire as well. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 3:49 pm
" But given that he took the appeal, he probably does, right? [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 9:12 am
Particularly given the number of lawsuits to which he's a party (feel free to do an internet search for a sample of those), I think his anonymity is pretty much out the window at this point. [read post]
