Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 6,584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
" Late last year, the Supremes granted a hearing in the case of Cabral v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 12:36 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 11:18 am
” In Copp, the state’s supreme court (then known as the Superior Court of Judicature), referencing a similar Wisconsin case (Meade v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 4:45 am
Lyons and, ultimately, the superior court judge read it. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Last month the Supreme Court delivered judgment in AP v DPP [2011] IESC 2, which concerned an appeal against the High Court’s refusal to grant an order prohibiting a fourth trial of the applicant. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 2:22 pm
Each week Wise Law Blog will review recent decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal.Abou-Elmaati v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 4:17 am
Vilches v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:53 pm
Just two months later, on October 22, 2008, the California Supreme Court granted the plaintiff's petition for review of the Court of Appeal's decision in Brinker. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:12 am
The Superior Court reversed the trial court’s decision granting Wyeth’s motion for a new trial and reinstated the compensatory and punitive damages verdicts. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:00 pm
We previously wrote in less than glowing terms about the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division’s decision in Kendall v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 1:06 pm
Granted, a footnote in the Supreme Court’s Basic v, Levinson opinion flatly stated that “trading and profit making by insiders can serve as an indication of materiality. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:16 am
The Court affirmed the superior court’s action in remanding the case for trial. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 6:53 pm
In Photocure v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:23 pm
Superior Ct., No. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:23 pm
Superior Ct., No. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
The Los Angeles Superior Court granted summary judgment in favor of the company, concluding that the drivers were properly classified as a matter of law and not entitled to trial on their claims. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
Kenety V, with assistance from Frank Ledda, Senior Chief Counsel in the Detroit Office of the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:01 am
The complaint alleges the transfers at issue were previously approved by a number of superior courts. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
The high court granted the state's petition for review of a 9th U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:08 pm
Superior Court (filed January 13, 2011) 2011 DJDAR 658. [read post]
