Search for: "IN RE: ENGLAND" Results 4881 - 4900 of 4,906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2006, 11:14 am
It's not the broken promises and the outright lying, although we're getting close. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 6:14 am
It's not the broken promises and the outright lying, although we're getting close. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 8:56 am
Just because we don't have administrative courts in England, I don't see it as a reason to downgrade the German ones in translation! [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 5:11 pm
Some of today's respondents have expressed skepticism about my assertion that having a better bureaucracy was the key advantage enjoyed by England over Spain in the 1580s or by the U.S.... [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 6:52 am
Says the IPKat, that's the whole point: the real game is seeing how many P3s you can import into the EU before you're allowed to do so. [read post]
8 Oct 2006, 8:46 pm
The Wikipedia entry says that the term "intellectual dishonesty" is just "an obfuscatory way to say 'you're lying.'"  But the word "dishonesty" doesn't exactly beat around the bush. [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 7:02 pm
He wants someone (ie, the government) to check on every single water user to check if they're using it properly, efficiently, and really truly need the water they're using? [read post]
18 Sep 2006, 10:08 am
The term "Hobson's choice" originated from Thomas Hobson, who lived in Cambridge, England from 1544 to 1630. [read post]
18 Sep 2006, 8:40 am
We draw on two sources to shed light on this question: a) a comparative analysis (considering England and Wales, the United States, Australia and New Zealand) and b) a series of semi-structured interviews with Canadian bankruptcy trustees and other insolvency professionals. [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 4:36 am
It's just that the Law Society of England and Wales has published, at no cost to readers, its comments on the European Commission's Proposal for a Directive on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights.The Law Society's view is that the proposal is insufficiently thought out and that it contains serious flaws. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 10:33 am
This was one of the points Marty Lederman makes in his comment on your piece.What's striking, however, in re-reading O'Connor's opinion is actually how narrowly it may be thinking about the current "war. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 5:36 am
The very title of this book invites you to fall asleep before it has even been opened, but, surprisingly, it's quite interesting, if you're into that sort of thing (English Legal History). [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 8:45 am
Velvel velvel@mslaw.edu>Re: [Conflict] Email from the Dead/Missing Canadian UN ObserverI believe an important point in regard to your email is this: what do you do when guerrillas hide among the population, fire guns and rockets from among their human shields, and you have no way of separating them from their shields while they continue to fire at and kill you or your citizens? [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 4:56 am
"The res judicata effect of the Board's July 14, 2006 Order is fertile ground for further discussion. [read post]
16 Jun 2006, 3:49 am
"It's informal and it's rapid, so you assume you're getting the same paralinguistic cues you get from spoken communication. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am by Tobias Thienel
However, the House of Lords explained yesterday that it had never held that severe crimes could not be acts of state in the sense of the rule of immunity ratione materiae (Lord Hoffmann, at paras. 86-88), and Lord Bingham doubted (at para. 19) whether Pinochet (No. 1) still possessed any value as precedent, having been set aside for procedural reasons (In re Pinochet [2000] 1 AC 119) and superseded by Pinochet (No. 3). [read post]