Search for: "In re Faith S." Results 4881 - 4900 of 11,706
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2016, 12:28 pm by Stephen M. Fuerch
In this 2016 decision, the court re-affirmed that, if an employee is alleging that his employer discriminated based upon his disability or perceived disability, he is not required to prove that the employer’s adverse actions were the result of an intent to discriminate. [read post]
31 May 2016, 12:28 pm by Stephen M. Fuerch
In this 2016 decision, the court re-affirmed that, if an employee is alleging that his employer discriminated based upon his disability or perceived disability, he is not required to prove that the employer’s adverse actions were the result of an intent to discriminate. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:36 am by Orin Kerr
The gist of the Justice Department’s argument is that there was no bad faith in the representations to the court by Justice Department lawyers and that Hanen’s order was itself illegal because it exceeded his authority. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:11 am by SHG
 It’s that, by obtaining a second warrant, all evils magically disappear, because it was covered by the government’s “good faith. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
The rest of last week’s fare is back on the menu – but don’t worry, I hear they’re better as leftovers. [read post]
25 May 2016, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
  If you’re disappointed that you missed it, you’re in luck – there’s a recording of the session! [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:16 pm by Michael Grossman
His former lawyer didn’t just withdraw from representation for lack of faith in the man’s case. [read post]
24 May 2016, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
However, the section that the filtering decisions be made “in good faith,” and the plaintiff argued that Google’s decisions lacked good faith. [read post]
24 May 2016, 9:45 am by John Jascob
That decision, the Delaware Court of Chancery held, did not amount to an intentional disregard for the directors' duties, nor was it inexplicable on any ground other than bad faith (In re Chelsea Therapeutics International Ltd. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:46 am by MBettman
On remand, in a unanimous decision written by Judge Waite, joined by Judges DeGenaro and Robb, the Seventh District Court of Appeals held that there is nothing to suggest that the prosecution has acted in bad faith, and absent misconduct on the part of the state, a mistrial or hung jury does not bar retrial(s). [read post]
22 May 2016, 10:06 pm by Sandy Levinson
 interestingly enough, President Obama now seems to have majority approval, but you may have noticed that he's not running for re-election. [read post]
21 May 2016, 12:44 pm by Elijah Yip
  So what relief is available if you’re a victim of trade secret theft? [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 4 – Contracts and Securities Discussion Leaders: Greg Klass, Ann Lipton, Andrea Matwyshyn Matwyshyn: there’s a duty to perform in good faith in the US, but no duty to negotiate in good faith. [read post]
20 May 2016, 5:23 am by SHG
 The answer, apparently, is whether you want there to be one for whatever outcome you’re trying to achieve. [read post]
20 May 2016, 1:36 am by Steve Mehta
Show how your proposal is in their interests, even if they’re not smart enough to do the same. [read post]
19 May 2016, 3:46 pm by David Schraub
So, for example, in Playing with Cards I discuss the bad faith "card" retort to discrimination claims by looking at how Gamergaters responded to Anita Sarkeesian's contentions of sexism in the video game community (to talk of sexism is an "I-win button") and how Caryl Churchill dismissed objections that her play Seven Jewish Children was anti-Semitic ("It's the usual tactic. [read post]