Search for: "John Does, 1-2" Results 4881 - 4900 of 10,072
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
The CJEU in Svensson (C-466/12) ruled that a clickable hyperlink (as well as a framing link) to an authorised and publicly available work does not infringe the communication to the public right, because the public is not new. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 4:28 pm by Dennis
These topics cut across all traditional areas of law.2. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 8:53 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Madison, Northeastern University School of Law ·         Ann Marie Marciarille, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law ·         Hillary Greene, University of Connecticut School of Law (moderator) Saturday, JAN. 3 12:30 pm - 2:30 pm Omni Shoreham Hotel Diplomat Ballroom Lobby Level Lunch Debate: Resolved, that the Affordable Care Act Does Not… [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 4:30 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
This means 1) focusing on a niche, 2) following leading bloggers, reporters, and writers in the niche, 3) following subjects whether they be laws, terms of art, companies, products/services, or people related to your niche, and 4) engaging in the “conversation. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 2:35 pm by JB
  But both of these are value choices:  I want to make sure that the Constitution maintains democratic legitimacy over time, they want to ensure that the Constitution produces good consequences.Moreover, Mike and John have an elaborate theory of stare decisis that lets them accept certain non-originalist precedents (1) where they reflect a very strong contemporary consensus or (2) where they compensate for previous failings in the process that produced the… [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am by Robert B. Milligan and Michael Wexler
  And, as the study we referenced demonstrates, companies that already have an incident response plan in place spend 1/3 less on security incidents than those that do not have an incident response protocol. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am by Editors
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 7:45 am by John J. Malm
If you or a loved one has been injured by an unsafe or defective product, contact product liability attorney John Malm at John J. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:33 am by SHG
North Carolina, by a 6-2-1 decision, the Supremes have completed the fuzzying up of search and seizure law that began with Whren, where phony “objective” justifications for a stop were approved even though they bore no connection with reality or truth. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
The National Labor Relations Board has been so hyperactive lately reshaping the law for the benefit of labor unions that it gets a roundup all to itself: NLRB announces new right to use employer’s email system for union organizing [Daniel Schwartz] Per 2-1 vote, NLRB agrees with ALJ that restaurant can’t fire workers over false posters claiming its food is unsafe [Patrick DePoy and Christopher Johlie, JD Supra; earlier on case, and IWW campaign against MikLin/Jimmy… [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:00 am by David Crockett
Grantee #1 does not have to prove that the grantee #2 somehow had actual knowledge of the sale or transfer to grantee #1. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm by Howard Knopf
Legal costs:A.1 Stikeman Elliott LLP $ 123,580.98A.2 Christian Tacit $ 54,240.00B. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:15 am by Dennis Crouch
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966)(outlining test) and KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am by Darien Shanske
 Brasher did not get to go into much more detail about this argument before being asked about (1) whether the railroads could pay the motor fuel excise tax and (2) how to analyze the slightly different case of water transport. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
§875(c); and (2) Regardless of what the statute provides, does the First Amendment right of free speech require that only a person intending to cause fear with his threatening utterances be subject to criminal penalties? [read post]