Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 29,832
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2021, 8:02 am
United States, 585 U. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am
Lord Leggatt’s response to that analogy is noteworthy and he highlighted that negligence requires proof of damage and the need to show a certain level of actual damage. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:32 pm
In Gundy v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 2:41 pm
Holloman v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 1:37 am
In the High Court, Warby J decided that the iPhone users did not have the same interest because they would have suffered different levels of damage, including possibly no damage at all. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 9:08 pm
Prior to Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 3:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 8:00 am
Herns v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:09 am
If that was the case, however, it is not unfair to state that such level of use must have been on the cusp of acceptability. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 4:50 am
” United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 1:53 am
With regard to the Actavis v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 12:52 pm
Under Franks v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 12:39 pm
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Beckley Oncology Assocs. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
In November 2019, the Board dismissed the appeal and found that there was a likelihood of confusion by considering, first, the average degree of visual and phonetic similarity of the marks at issue and, second, the identity of the goods in question.The Applicant subsequently appealed to the General Court.The General Court’s considerationsRelevant public and its level of attentionThe General Court confirmed the Board’s finding that the relevant public was the French public,… [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 5:30 am
In the case of Doughitt v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:00 pm
At the federal level, United States trademark law is governed by the Trademark Act of 1946, or the Lanham Act, which provides for, among other [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court’s 1976 decision in United States v. [read post]