Search for: "Level v. State" Results 4881 - 4900 of 29,832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am by CMS
 Lord Leggatt’s response to that analogy is noteworthy and he highlighted that negligence requires proof of damage and the need to show a certain level of actual damage. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 1:37 am by CMS
In the High Court, Warby J decided that the iPhone users did not have the same interest because they would have suffered different levels of damage, including possibly no damage at all. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:09 am by Neil Wilkof
If that was the case, however, it is not unfair to state that such level of use must have been on the cusp of acceptability. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:52 am by Nedim Malovic
In November 2019, the Board dismissed the appeal and found that there was a likelihood of confusion by considering, first, the average degree of visual and phonetic similarity of the marks at issue and, second, the identity of the goods in question.The Applicant subsequently appealed to the General Court.The General Court’s considerationsRelevant public and its level of attentionThe General Court confirmed the Board’s finding that the relevant public was the French public,… [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:00 pm by Shannon O'Hare
At the federal level, United States trademark law is governed by the Trademark Act of 1946, or the Lanham Act, which provides for, among other [read post]