Search for: "Little v State"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 26,845
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2020, 11:51 am
The subcommittee staff’s analysis of the constitutionality of remote voting and participation focused heavily on whether a proposed change to the Senate’s rules, or the adoption of a new rule, would comply with the three-part test the Supreme Court established in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:12 am
To discuss this in this way is heresy, I realize, but please indulge this heretic a little further before you light a fire under my stake. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:04 am
And when the Second Circuit is confronted with a tricky state-law situation for which there is little guidance from the state courts, it certifies the issue to the New York Court of Appeals for a definitive ruling under state law. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
At Slate, David Gans argues that “[t]he sweeping arguments for a total religious exemption” in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not… [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:26 pm
In its 2012 decision, Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:10 pm
Altman v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:10 pm
Altman v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:35 am
State v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
Madison, and the Missouri Crisis are told alongside less familiar ones like Martin v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 4:47 pm
Centre for Democracy and the Rule of Law v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 3:23 pm
" Here's the heart of the opinion in Maryville Baptist Church v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
United States, 290 U.S. 13, 16 (1933)); see United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:13 pm
Because the court left open the question, there’s relatively little guidance as to what additional measures online platforms are actually required to take. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:04 pm
But in the meantime, add this to the list of who's on one side and who's on the other.Plus, this case has a neat little twist that I haven't seen before. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am
” Never, but apparently, not for long.On June 20 of last year, in Gundy v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
