Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P" Results 4881 - 4900 of 5,344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2008, 8:27 pm
After that loss, Touchcom sued the B&P for malpractice in preparing and filing the patent application. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 12:00 am
Uncle P Productions, LLC (2008) 2nd Appellate District, Case Number B198477, was never published. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP)   Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46)   Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46)   United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office)   United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance) UK patent… [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 12:10 am
” Most often these matters are capable of being resolved through a frank and open dialogue with the insurer. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
., decided 10/16/2008)There's a lot in here, so be sure to read this decision if you're on the property side of the P&C equation.Jeweler's (or "jeweller's" if you're across the pond) block insurance is all-risk specialized insurance coverage for jewelers. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:26 am
To accept additions to any estate or trust from sources other than the estate of the decedent, minor, mental incompetent or the settlor of a trust; b. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
P., states that leave to amend pleadings should be "freely given when justice so requires," but if the amendment would be prejudicial to the other party, leave will be denied. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:12 am
Torrance (University of Kansas - School of Law) has posted Metaphysics and Patenting Life (University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 76, p. 363, 2007) on SSRN. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:08 pm
As you may know Rule 37-B is the new BC rule dealing with formal settlements and costs consequences in the BC Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
§343-1(a) allows state enforcement of FDCA violations in the food area, and (b) a private action for violating the state consumer fraud statute, incorporating the standards of California's "little FDCA" statute (also known as the Sherman Act), which in turn just happens to incorporate the FDA's food standards, is a matter of "state," not "federal," enforcement. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
P. 23(b)(2) requirements for certification; and 4) remand was necessary for consideration of whether the proposed damages class met the Rule 23(b)(3) requirements. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
., d/b/a ADB Utility Contractors, Inc. (14-CA-27386, et al.; 353 NLRB No. 21) St. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 6:01 pm
  This is an increase not only of "criteria pollutants" (i.e., Volatile Organic Compounds, Nitrous Oxides, and Particulate Matter) but also of "Hazardous Air Pollutants" and greenhouse gases. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:11 pm
  A plaintiff will not and likely should not be privy to such matters of insurance coverage between a defendant and ICBC. [34]                        The contest in this case was between the plaintiff and the defendants, and the insurance benefits available to the defendants do not, in my view, fall within the [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 3:00 am
If a state follows the rule of law and apply the law consistently, uniformly and in an impartial way, the societal benefits are legal security for the citizens and, according to the Political and Economic Risk Consultancy (PERC)[34] “[b]etter judicial systems are associated with better IPR protection, lower corruption and wealthier economies. [read post]