Search for: "Majors v. Majors"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 55,523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2009, 6:30 pm
This week, the Supreme Court took the rare step of deciding an asylum case, Negusie v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 1:32 pm
In a major decision regarding eminent domain, whether the government must pay damages when its attempts to condemn property fail, and the standards applicable to challenging the government's claim that a taking is for public use, the Hawaii Supreme Court today issued an opinion in County of Hawaii v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:46 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:05 am
Reynolds Tobacco Company v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 1:10 pm
On January 21, 2025, the United States Court of Federal Claims issued a ruling in MVL USA, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:28 am
Scott Panetti's lawyers won a major case, Panetti v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 3:48 am
The First Department held this allegation insufficient and dismissed the complaint’s remaining claims, explaining that this Court has made clear that Business Corporation Law § 626(c) “does not differentiate between minority and majority shareholders for demand purposes” (see Ocelot Capital Mgt., LLC v Hershkovitz, 90 AD3d 464, 466 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:25 am
A close reading of the lead opinion, concurrences, and dissents in Trump v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 am
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:54 pm
; and Calder v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 7:18 am
Borello & Sons Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 4:18 pm
Prior to Hamilton v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 6:40 am
Second, no matter who won, real power in Iran still resides with the religious establishment, which decided who could run for president and still makes the major decisions.Iran is nonetheless an interesting case in part because SOMETHING was at stake in elections that could have been fairly conducted and tabulated. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:33 am
Westlaw gets some free advertising in both the majority and concurring opinions here. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 10:56 am
Due to my slightly delayed response, many sites have already published their analysis of the complaint, and most of the major issues have been addressed. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 12:16 pm
” Hart v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 5:42 pm
I've recovering from a nasty cold, but the USSC issuing an opinion in US v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 3:43 am
’” That 1952 case, Ray v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 3:27 am
Peter Sherwood in Manzella v Caporuscio, 2015 NY Slip Op 31870(U)[Sup Ct NY County Oct. 6, 2015], granted summary judgment for the chef/majority member on his counterclaim against the minority member for breach of fiduciary duty and modified a prior Consent Order to authorize termination of the minority member’s employment for cause. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
The case is Bellevue School Dist. v. [read post]
