Search for: "Majors v. Majors"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 55,491
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2024, 6:25 am
A close reading of the lead opinion, concurrences, and dissents in Trump v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 3:48 am
The First Department held this allegation insufficient and dismissed the complaint’s remaining claims, explaining that this Court has made clear that Business Corporation Law § 626(c) “does not differentiate between minority and majority shareholders for demand purposes” (see Ocelot Capital Mgt., LLC v Hershkovitz, 90 AD3d 464, 466 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 am
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:54 pm
; and Calder v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 7:18 am
Borello & Sons Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 4:18 pm
Prior to Hamilton v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 6:40 am
Second, no matter who won, real power in Iran still resides with the religious establishment, which decided who could run for president and still makes the major decisions.Iran is nonetheless an interesting case in part because SOMETHING was at stake in elections that could have been fairly conducted and tabulated. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:33 am
Westlaw gets some free advertising in both the majority and concurring opinions here. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 10:56 am
Due to my slightly delayed response, many sites have already published their analysis of the complaint, and most of the major issues have been addressed. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 3:43 am
’” That 1952 case, Ray v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 12:16 pm
” Hart v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 5:42 pm
I've recovering from a nasty cold, but the USSC issuing an opinion in US v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 3:27 am
Peter Sherwood in Manzella v Caporuscio, 2015 NY Slip Op 31870(U)[Sup Ct NY County Oct. 6, 2015], granted summary judgment for the chef/majority member on his counterclaim against the minority member for breach of fiduciary duty and modified a prior Consent Order to authorize termination of the minority member’s employment for cause. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
The case is Bellevue School Dist. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 12:54 pm
It is apparently because of his son's employment that Kennedy on Monday suddenly recused in the case, Credit Suisse v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 11:57 am
A majority of the 3 judge panel hearing the case agreed with the district court and ratified the contempt order against EchoStar (NASDAQ: SATS) and Dish Network (NASDAQ: DISH). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:29 pm
The case, Doe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 8:31 am
Reilly v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 10:54 am
But here's a link to CAAF's opinion in United States v. [read post]
