Search for: "National Labor Relations Board, The"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 8,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2019, 10:44 am
As we have discussed on multiple occasions in this blog as the Board expanded Section 7 rights during the Obama administration, employees have the right under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act to engage in concerted activities for the purpose of mutual aid or protection. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
Amends the National Labor Relations Act to require mediation and, if necessary, binding arbitration of initial contract negotiation disputes. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:37 am
This was a blow to United Rentals because it had a collective bargaining agreement with another union (also it didn't want to bargain with the Laborers Union when that agreement expired); and so it filed a charge with the National Labor Relations Board that Indiana Constructors and the Laborers Union were violating the National Labor Relations Act's "hot cargo" provision. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:53 pm
Nowhere is this more true than the labor and employment law field, where large agencies like the EEOC or NLRB are full of people who presumably sit around and do little else but think about the laws they enforce, and yet consistently issue guidance to the private sector about these laws that is, shall we say, less than helpful.Case in point: the recent NLRB Report that supposedly provides useful guidance on the interaction between the National Labor Relations Act,… [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:16 pm
Department of Labor Employee Benefit Security Administration (“EBSA”) today (October 22, 2019). [read post]
Are You a Joint-Employer with Your Suppliers? NLRB Examines Corporate Social Responsibility Policies
9 Aug 2016, 6:04 am
The NLRB May Find That It Does” Following is an excerpt: The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board), which continues to apply an ever expanding standard for determining whether a company that contracts with another business to supply contract labor or services in support of its operations should be treated as a joint employer of the supplier or contractor’s employees, is now considering whether a company’s requirement… [read post]
Are You a Joint-Employer with Your Suppliers? NLRB Examines Corporate Social Responsibility Policies
9 Aug 2016, 6:06 am
The NLRB May Find That It Does” Following is an excerpt: The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board), which continues to apply an ever expanding standard for determining whether a company that contracts with another business to supply contract labor or services in support of its operations should be treated as a joint employer of the supplier or contractor’s employees, is now considering whether a company’s requirement… [read post]
Are You a Joint-Employer with Your Suppliers? NLRB Examines Corporate Social Responsibility Policies
9 Aug 2016, 6:01 am
The NLRB May Find That It Does” Following is an excerpt: The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board), which continues to apply an ever expanding standard for determining whether a company that contracts with another business to supply contract labor or services in support of its operations should be treated as a joint employer of the supplier or contractor’s employees, is now considering whether a company’s requirement… [read post]
Are You a Joint-Employer with Your Suppliers? NLRB Examines Corporate Social Responsibility Policies
9 Aug 2016, 6:05 am
The NLRB May Find That It Does” Following is an excerpt: The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board), which continues to apply an ever expanding standard for determining whether a company that contracts with another business to supply contract labor or services in support of its operations should be treated as a joint employer of the supplier or contractor’s employees, is now considering whether a company’s requirement… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:29 am
" NLRB vacancies create high court headache "Besides three long vacant seats, the National Labor Relations Board now faces a U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 7:46 am
Noel Canning, the challenge to the president’s recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:33 am
As SCOTUSBlog reports, a coalition of industry groups filed a motion (and supplementary memorandum) to include a challenge to the constitutionality of President Obama’s recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board in ongoing litigation against recently adopted “notice posting” rule. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 10:34 am
On the other hand, some titles could go either way, such as “Who Needs the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)? [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 4:14 am
Three opinions from the National Labor Relations Board’s Acting General Counsel, the passage of state laws prohibiting employers from requesting social media account passwords, and industry specific guidance affecting certain businesses and professions are examples of some of these developments. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Last week, a National Labor Relations Board Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ruled, for the first time, that an employer could legally fire an employee based on Facebook activity. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:01 pm
” The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) employee rights notice-posting requirement was recently upheld as valid by U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 12:26 pm
The NLRB has said it is planning its own rule on how workers can be classified under the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
Although the company’s social media policy did contain a disclaimer—“This code does not restrict any activity that is protected or restricted by the National Labor Relations Act, whistleblower laws, or any other privacy rights”— that sentence was not sufficient to cure the unlawfulness of the other provisions, the ALJ ruled, citing Allied Mechanical. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:57 am
Earlier this year, the National Labor Relations Board, in a case called D.R. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm
Noel Channing, involves whether the appointment of three members of the National Labor Relations Board by the president was allowed under the constitution. [read post]
