Search for: "People v. Powers" Results 4881 - 4900 of 15,371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am by velvel
Ohio, a village mayor had the power to try and fine persons accused of possessing intoxicating beverages in violation of state law. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 10:03 pm by Daniel Solove
  Kowalski invited about 100 people to join the page, and about 24 people joined. [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:48 am by Jeff Gamso
  Or maybe not.But then, you don't live in a world where you think everyone should fear you, where you know that the hearts of people in power are all pure. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 3:59 pm
The occasion for the study was the Supreme Court's decision in Scott v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 5:49 pm
In the case of U.S. v Wilson (32 US 150) the Supreme Court stated that a pardon is like a gift that can be refused, upholding the notion in Burdick v U.S. (236 US 79). [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Rather, in each case the court must undertake an analysis that centers on the authority under which the entity was created, the power distribution or sharing model under which it exists, the nature of its role, the power it possesses and under which it purports to act, and a realistic appraisal of its functional relationship to affected parties and constituencies' (Matter of Smith v City Univ. of NY, 92 NY2d 707, 713 [1999])" (Perez, 5 NY3d at 528; see Snyder… [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 6:20 am by David G. Badertscher
Kelly APPELLATE TERMCriminal Practice Panel Finds Use of Delegated Prosecutorial Powers Does Not Violates Equal Protection People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am by Stephen Page
In a decision akin to that delived by the Court of Appeal, a Queensland Magistrate has helped set out the test for domestic violence cases under that State's Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:11 pm by Corey Rayburn Yung
It's relevant first because, of course, it's often the Commerce Clause that gives rise to the power to criminalize conduct and to punish people for that conduct. [read post]
13 May 2020, 10:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court decision in Texas v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:07 am by Jennifer Lynch
” This access provides a necessary check against government secrecy and the arbitrary exercise of official power and—because of the power the police wield—is no more necessary than when the records concern police conduct. [read post]