Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 4881 - 4900 of 12,163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2011, 8:32 am by Dennis Crouch
Whether the removal of those works from the public domain violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:47 am
(The Court in Hamdan indicated that the DTA's references to "the Constitution and laws of the United States" includes "the law of war," 126 S. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:39 am by Jon Gelman
P. 9.330(d)(2).About 60 years ago, writing for the United States Supreme Court in Brown v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:57 pm by Amy Howe
The justices consolidated the three petitions (United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:15 am
United States Parole Commission, 13 F.3d 1073 (U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 4:04 am by SHG
United States was the case, the opportunity, for the Supreme Court of the United States to change this. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 5:30 pm by Aimee Brown
The second case this week is United Power, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:23 pm
Pucciarelli Issue: Whether Congress, in passing the Authorization for Use of Military Force after September 11, authorized the indefinite military detention of a legal immigrant seized on domestic soil whom the government alleged to have conspired with al Qaeda to carry out attacks against the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:22 pm
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
While verification will proceed regardless of whether petitions are filed, petitions can be filed until July 19. [read post]
On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued the “Unleashing American Energy” Executive Order (“EO”) with the stated purpose of ensuring an abundant supply of affordable and reliable energy in the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 5:41 pm
Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney United States Bankruptcy Court Los Angeles Bankruptcy Court Chapter 11 Business Bankruptcy Case: In re Brice Road Developments, LLC 6th Cir. [read post]
15 Mar 2025, 6:54 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 00163 (1st Dept., 20925) the Appellate Division held that unless a court states otherwise a voluntary discontinuance is without prejudice and within the court’s discretion (see CPLR 3217[b]; see also Matter of Reid v. [read post]