Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 7,625
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am
This blog’s Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:41 am
He relied on "the principles laid down in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 12:32 am
Oracle isn't saying that copyright is better than patents (which it officially stated about 20 years ago) or the other way round. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 2:37 am
State Department. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
He argues that “what Georgia — and other states — have done since” the Court’s decision in Atkins v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:39 am
Though he didn't attend the meeting he was still paid for the two hours that the meeting would have taken because his former supervisor considered that he would not have been in the motorcycle accident but for the meeting.The workers' compensation judge, the Appeals Board and the 5th District all found compensability.In Kansas, the state Supreme Court sent a case back to the fact finding courts to determine if an employee who was injured in a go-kart accident was in the course and scope of… [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Hawaii: The so-called ‘Steven Tyler Act’, named after the lead singer of Aerosmith, will be considered in the state Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 4:10 am
In Eagle Cove Camp & Conference Center, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 2:35 pm
In the case of Woods v State (a similar appellate case) it was determined that “an intent beyond mere rudeness was required before the court could adjudicate Mr. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:46 am
This opinion comes nearly two years after the California Supreme Court’s February 2011 decision in Pineda v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am
United States, a challenge to the ban on direct corporate campaign spending in the Federal Campaign Finance Act, and McCutcheon v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
Today, the Second Chamber of the General Court handed over two interesting judgments (cases T-426/11 and T-412/11, Maharishi Foundation Ltd. v OHIM), which provide useful guidance on the evaluation of the descriptive character of a sign, as well as on the notion of relevant public, in relation to a word sign whose meaning can be easily understood by consumers residing in different member states, due to its closeness to equivalent expressions in other national languages. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:18 am
The White Paper cites the Hamdi opinion (and Mathews v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 5:56 am
Braille Battery, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 7:14 pm
See Loving v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Schreiner, Jr., January 13, 2013) Cratchit v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 12:04 pm
Midwestern states Illinois and Ohio rounded out the top ten. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
Perry, the challenge to California Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 8:10 am
Vrasic v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:50 pm
The Pomeroy Collection, Ltd. v. [read post]
