Search for: "SCOTUSblog"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 16,502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2007, 3:15 pm
Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSblog has this post and Mark Sherman for the AP has this story discussing oral argument today in Snyder v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 8:34 am
The following is Scotusblog's summary: "The Court agreed to decide whether the federal law that protects railroads from discriminatory state taxes allows the carriers to challenge the state's accounting method for fixing the market value of their property (CSX Transportation v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 12:00 pm
All the details at here at SCOTUSblog, and this is Lyle Denniston's account of the three habeas cases new to the Court's docket:In one of the criminal appeals the Court accepted for review, the Court will rule on a federal appeals court's authority to overturn a death sentence in a habeas case, based on a finding that the prosecutor's closing argument in the penalty phase was unfairly inflammatory (Roper v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:45 am
Healthcare coverage continues with SCOTUSblog’s ongoing symposium on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, which began on Monday. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:02 am
And, to my pleasure and surprise, as reported here and hereat SCOTUSblog, the Supreme Court has lots of this action with arguments in some criminal justice cases and the release of a number of decisions in previously argued cases. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:41 am
SCOTUSblog's Marty Lederman has this to say about new Supreme Court policies requiring parties and amici to file electronic briefs, which the Court promises to post online within a day of filing:That database will be an enormously helpful resource -- to litigants, counsel, scholars, students and researchers alike. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
As explained by SCOTUSblog, the petitioner's death has raised an interesting procedural conundrum in a criminal case pending before the United States Supreme Court, Claibourne v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:34 am
Something I found particularly interesting (quoting from the SCOTUSblog piece): In a 1995 review of Stephen Carter’s book on confirmation hearings, “Confirmation Messes, Old and New,” Kagan criticized senators for failing to ask, and nominees for refusing to answer, questions about their views on specific issues. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:20 am
SCOTUSblog data tells us that Justices Ginsburg and Kagan have not yet written for the December sitting, which is when the Court heard the Bay Mills argument. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:51 am
Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSblog has this post noting the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in seven Guantanamo detainee cases. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 3:31 pm
Orin Kerr has this long post at SCOTUSblog with the above title. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:20 am
SCOTUSblog has a nice recap of what happened this morning. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 8:22 am
(Steve Vladeck, One First) The post The morning read for Monday, April 21 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:43 am
If you haven't been over to ScotusBlog recently, you should check it out. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 3:27 am
Here are some additional resources: SCOTUSBlog has a wiki with information and links to probably everything you ever wanted to know about the case. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 8:05 pm
California, 06-8120, per SCOTUSBlog: "if police stop a car along the highway, does that result in detention of the passengers in the vehicle, for Fourth Amendment purposes, thus allowing them to contest the legality of the original stop. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:25 am
There continues to be an extraordinary degree of coverage of the story, including a comprehensive write-up by SCOTUSblog, available here. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 6:45 am
 SCOTUSblog's list of Petitions to Watch from this conference is here. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 6:50 am
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Supreme Court declines appeal from youths seeking to force action on climate crisis (John Fritze, CNN) A Landmark Lawsuit, Where Kids Sued America, Comes to an End (Karen Zraick, The New York Times) A new Supreme Court case could totally change which employers have to pay into unemployment benefits (Brit Morse, Fortune) America’s Supreme Court tackles a thorny voting-rights case (The Economist) The Judicial Impeachment Distraction (William… [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:00 am
Some background on the case is here, and briefs and documents are available on the the SCOTUSBlog. [read post]
