Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 4881 - 4900
of 6,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2007, 3:37 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
In Anderson v Anderson, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2023 WL 8246131, 2023 N.Y. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 4:22 am
Two weeks after Chancery’s decision, the Brooklyn Commercial Division issued an unusual decision in Hartill v Nunziata denying dismissal of a lawsuit brought by three siblings. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
The fourth edition of Duncan and Neill on Defamation, published in the Butterworths Common Law series, is now on sale. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 12:28 pm
The NYSID noted that a producer may respond orally to a client’s request for additional compensation, despite the fact that parts 30.3 (b) and (c) do not state this. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 1:00 pm
As in the Johnson v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:48 am
" Rapp sent a C&D in July 2008. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:43 am
Note that for SEC RIA’s to private investment vehicles, a “client” for purposes of this rule refers to the vehicle(s) managed by the RIA and not the underlying investors. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:10 am
[v] Soon after the book was published, I bought it and read it. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm
The Advocate General Szpunar (AG) has delivered his judgement in the case C‑434/15 Asociación Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain SL. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:07 pm
” Munoz v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm
California’s solicitor general, Edward C. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm
In a separate account for each client under that client’s name; or ii. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 10:01 am
At the time of its implementation (2015), the threshold was intended to be C$600 million for two years, followed by two years at C$800 million, and then C$1 billion for a year, after which it would be adjusted annually for inflation. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:32 am
In Hudson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
C. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:55 pm
In a prominent insider trading case, Dirks v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 5:59 pm
Fancaster, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
Let’s talk about Easha’s first case, Murray v. [read post]
