Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 21,135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2019, 6:47 am
True Organic Products, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
Nortonjnorton@nfllp.com1250 Broadway, 27th Fl.New York, NY 10001(212) 619-5400# # #COMPLAINT: Adrian Dominican Sisters, et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 11:23 am
Zang Category: Product #: Regular price:$ (Sale ends !) [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:27 pm
Cannon Category: Product #: Regular price:$ (Sale ends !) [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:48 pm
S. 223, 233 (2009) (quoting State Oil Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:21 am
The parties in USA DANCE, INC. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
Federal law uses some variation of the factors stated in S.E.C. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:22 am
Here are the materials in Chickasaw Nation v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:13 am
Iovate & University of Florida Research Foundation v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:13 am
Iovate & University of Florida Research Foundation v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 4:07 am
Supreme Court for argument time to support a challenge to New York City gun restrictions,” New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:45 am
Vega v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 10:36 pm
Two earlier posts had discussed the issue and the oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court in Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm
V. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 9:32 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:29 pm
New York State Liquor Authority, 476 U.S. 573 (1986); and Baldwin v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court will be hearing and deciding the case of Levine v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm
Despite constant citation, the effect of the “death row” case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439 has been profoundly diluted by a more recent line of authorities on the jurisdictional limits of the Convention under Article 1, notably, Bankovic v Belgium and others (2007) 44 EHRR 1 and R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26: The Claimants are US citizens convicted and sentenced by US Courts in respect of offences… [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:59 am
On the first question regarding foreign sales, plaintiff Lexmark relied on Federal Circuit precedent Jazz Photo, which held that a patent is exhausted only when the authorized first sale occurs in the United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm
According to the defendant it should be allowed to calculate overhead in proportion to the number of infringing sales versus the percentage of total sales as an acceptable method for estimating overhead costs (New Line Cinema Corp. v. [read post]
