Search for: "State v. Character" Results 4881 - 4900 of 7,504
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2012, 5:24 am by Rosalind English
 There is nothing modern or nanny-state about the doctrine that make masters liable to society for the wrongdoing of their servants. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:49 am by Sam Murrant
In the courts MK & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2012] EWHC 1896 (Admin) Failed asylum seekers should be able to apply for housing support whilst making fresh applications. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 12:42 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Since it was handed down late last month, the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 5:14 am
Jurisdictional classification, position classification and determining the compensation to be paid individuals in the State’s “civil service” DeMartino v City of New York, 2012 NY Slip Op 22178, Supreme Court, New York County The City of New York promulgated Personnel Orders No. 2012/1 and 2012/2 that approve and resulted in an amendment to Rule X of the Personnel Rules and Regulations of the City of New York. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:27 am
Such an assessment was made of two (Mc)marks by the General Court in Case T-466/09 Comercial Losan SLU v OHMI, as reported last Friday on the Class 46 blog. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:44 pm by Michael O'Hear
Since it was handed down late last month, the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:01 pm by Lorraine Fleck
The SCC applied its fair dealing test set out in CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:53 pm
Jurisdictional classification, position classification and determining the compensation to be paid individuals in the State’s “civil service” DeMartino v City of New York, 2012 NY Slip Op 22178, Supreme Court, New York County The City of New York promulgated Personnel Orders No. 2012/1 and 2012/2 that approve and resulted in an amendment to Rule X of the Personnel Rules and Regulations of the City of New York. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:58 am by Joe Kristan
Cite: Order on Summary Judgement, 7/9/12: Bennett Dorrance et ux. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:48 am by Rosalind English
It had been recognised in the domestic law as having the character of a “natural monopoly” and had an unrivalled market position in Slovakia. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:18 am by Michael O'Hear
I’ll always remember the day the Supreme Court declared the Gun-Free School Zones Act unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]