Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 13,698
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm
Only 4 cited © cases: Mazer v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:30 am
In 1981, in Rostker v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:16 pm
Displays Inc., 532 U.S. 23, 58 USPQ2d 1001, 1006 (2001) (quoting Inwood Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:16 pm
Displays Inc., 532 U.S. 23, 58 USPQ2d 1001, 1006 (2001) (quoting Inwood Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm
” (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 ¶77 150). [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:11 pm
United States, in which the Supreme Court had to determine the ordinary meaning of the phrase “carries a firearm. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 7:44 am
In Gill v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:42 pm
For example, in Muscarello v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:34 am
The Local Health Boards and Secretary of State argued that consistently throughout the case law, the NHS has defined the limits of its own responsibilities under s 3(1) of the 2006 Act and that this should be respected. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:07 am
Without this the level and extent of protection is unclear, and the mark should not be registered, since "…if the authorities and the public are left in a state of confusion as to the nature of the sign then these requirements will not be satisfied".Lord Justice Kitchin further noted that, when considering the precise make-up on a mark, one has to consider both the pictorial representation and the description that accompanies it. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 11:02 am
Nor did they marry promptly after the Court’s decision in Garden State Equality v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
All recordings will be deleted following the conclusion of the semester in which the recorded course occurs (unless all identifying student images are edited out of the recording, in which case the professor and SIA may jointly decide to retain the edited recording for other purposes).By registering for or attending SIA courses, you consent to the school’s making and display of class recordings within the scope of this [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
The sign described in (a) is a sign which is “identical to, or likely to be mistaken for, a registered trade mark”. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:08 am
In a 1946 Supreme Court case Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 9:17 am
Supreme Court on June 19, 2017, in Packingham v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 9:17 am
Supreme Court on June 19, 2017, in Packingham v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:50 am
California and in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 6:06 am
” [2] See SEC v. [read post]
