Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 14,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2015, 8:10 pm
The Appeals Officer further cites to Glara Fashion Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:03 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 2:48 pm
” In 1995 the Seventh Circuit in Pepsico v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 8:34 am
ARNOTT v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am
Alex Loomis walked us through the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Weinstein v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 12:30 pm
” But this year — emboldened by the Trump administration’s attacks on reproductive health care access and the changes on the Supreme Court — states are taking direct aim at Roe v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 10:55 am
This case, Campbell v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
" The subsequent turf wars over who paid for destitute asylum seekers arguably included such cases as Westminster CC v NASS [2002] 1 WLR 2956, [2002] UKHL 38, W v Croydon, A v Hackney [2007] 1 WLR 3168, [2007] EWCA Civ 266, R v Wandsworth LBC ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539, R (Mani) v Lambeth LBC [2002] EWCA Civ 836, and, of course, M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) and R (Zarzour) v LB of Hillingdon [2009] EWCA Civ 1529. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
" The subsequent turf wars over who paid for destitute asylum seekers arguably included such cases as Westminster CC v NASS [2002] 1 WLR 2956, [2002] UKHL 38, W v Croydon, A v Hackney [2007] 1 WLR 3168, [2007] EWCA Civ 266, R v Wandsworth LBC ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539, R (Mani) v Lambeth LBC [2002] EWCA Civ 836, and, of course, M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) and R (Zarzour) v LB of Hillingdon [2009] EWCA Civ 1529. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:52 am
The Anti-abortion Movement Will Win Even If It Loses By Mary Ziegler, professor at the Florida State University College of Law Legal scholar Mary Ziegler argues that a Supreme Court ruling against Texas’s recent abortion law, Senate Bill 8, would not indicate that the Court will continue to preserve its decision in Roe v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
Fortunately, the Oregon Supreme Court recently put some strong limits on disorderly conduct prosecutions where a suspect allegedly tailgated another car, and called out some choice words to passersby, all over around a five-minute period. blank">Oregon v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
As it stated at para. 7 of Vavilov, it had become clear that the simplicity and predictability promised by Dunsmuir v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 7:06 pm
Most interesting is the possibility that in return for stronger ties the EU might have effectively waived the application of its strong business and human rights measures to EU Cuba bilateral relations. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
Further, in NDMC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:22 am
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 3:17 am
In the case of Perry v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
As the Court of Appeals opined in Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, New York State's Freedom of Information Law [FOIL] "expresses this State's strong commitment to open government and public accountability and imposes a broad standard of disclosure upon the State and its agencies. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
As the Court of Appeals opined in Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, New York State's Freedom of Information Law [FOIL] "expresses this State's strong commitment to open government and public accountability and imposes a broad standard of disclosure upon the State and its agencies. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 7:01 am
Thus, for instance, in United States v. [read post]
