Search for: "U. S. Federal Government"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 5,046
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2008, 5:07 am
William McGeveran, McIntyre's Checkbook: Privacy Costs of Political Contribution Disclosure, 6 U. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 5:28 pm
Now, the USPTO has filed it’s appeal brief with the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 8:03 pm
I Wud ♥ to Work 4 U!! [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:00 am
The federal government ensure that labor laws protecting all workers, regardless of citizenship or immigration status, are enforced. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
S. 354, 360-361 (1959) (constitutional grant "empowered the federal courts . . . to continue the development of [maritime] law"). [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 5:48 am
Based on the research and practices of the U. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:05 pm
The Justice Department has argued strenuously that federal judges have no authority to interfere with government decisions on transfers of Guantanamo detainees to any other place. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:15 pm
Marmar's name. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
U. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 4:57 am
The White House directed another veto threat at a perfectly sensible provision in the Senate version of the bill: [U]nlike the House version, the Senate's legislation includes a provision by Sen. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
S. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
In this century, governments have too often attempted to justify their lethal fury by the benefits such killing would bring to the rest Or society. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:50 am
And because “New Mexico’s fundamental public policy requires that consumers with small claims have a mechanism for dispute resolution via the class action,” applying Texas law would run contrary to this public policy so New Mexico law governed the dispute. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:24 pm
Bell, 465 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 6:25 pm
Under 18 U. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 pm
U. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:24 pm
S. 535, 538 (1894), reaffirmed that the Second Amendment applies only to the Federal Government. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:56 pm
Sprague, 282 U. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 11:50 am
" 307 U. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:58 am
Writing for the majority, Justice Souter reasoned: "[U]nder the federal standard, an accusation filed with a judicial officer is sufficiently formal, and the government’s commitment to prosecute it sufficiently concrete, when the accusation prompts arraignment and restrictions on the accused’s liberty to facilitate the prosecution. [read post]
