Search for: "U.S. Direct Express"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 9,636
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
This sort of expression is at the very heart of political speech which the First Amendment most strongly protects. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:13 am
One word in an answer, one odd facial expression, can change the direction of a trial in ways no one could anticipate. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 2:24 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 10:46 pm
” Hallman and researchers at Tennessee State University joined forces on a project funded by the U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:37 pm
Selden, 101 U.S. 99 (1880) the leading case on copyright's idea-expression dichotomy, rather than Perris v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 12:31 pm
Applicants with direct IC experience are preferred. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 1:38 pm
The views expressed are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of West Point, the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:25 am
As long as there is room for Google to say to Canada (or France), “Your order will put us in direct and significant violation of U.S. law,” the order is not a limitless assertion of extraterritorial jurisdiction. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:32 am
Family members populate the upper tiers of the West Wing, and he has commissioned his son-in-law, a 36 year-old with no government experience, to manage Middle East policy, the U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
The U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 3:53 pm
Rights are the collective expression of those individual activities that the state must protect or against which the state may not interfere. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 2:01 pm
The district court found that the contents of the blog, by itself, amounted to protected expression under the First Amendment, but that the contents of the blog also shed light on Bolton's other actions, s`me of which were acts of harassment. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
But notwithstanding the plaintiffs’ hard pull in the other direction, the opinions also suggest that presidents may in limited cases accept certain fixed benefits—as I will explain, these might be pensions from the U.S. state that used to employ them or money damages from a foreign country against which, in a past life, they successfully won a judgment. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
The debate has been challenging, with some commentators expressing concerns over privacy protections for U.S. citizens whose information is “incidentally collected” during the surveillance process. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:15 am
Dole, 483 U.S. 203 (1987). [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:00 am
Five NATO member states currently meet this commitment (the U.S., the U.K., Poland, Estonia, and Greece). [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 8:30 am
The U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:11 pm
Or violate freedom of expression rights The Supreme Court also dismissed Google’s freedom of expression argument. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 10:48 am
EFF intervened in the case, explaining [.pdf] that such an injunction ran directly contrary to both the U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm
In 2014, the U.S. [read post]
