Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 51,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it relates to… [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
See BDO Seidman v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:52 am
In Naranjo v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:16 am
Ever since County of Riverside v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:13 am
Given that the justices and their clerks are much more likely to do a poor job surveying a literature, the need for them to be transparent is all the greater. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:18 am
Leroy Carhart in Gonzales v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 3:49 am
The case cite is U.S. v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 12:04 am
Of consistency of a term used in different claims: "We apply a ‘presumption that the same terms appearing in different portions of the claims should be given the same meaning unless it is clear from the specification and prosecution history that the terms have different meanings at different portions of the claims.'" PODS, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:56 am
Given the potential for financial penalties and the absence of a grace period for compliance with the guidance, we would suggest that organisations urgently review the basis upon which they transfer personal data from the DIFC to the US to ensure that they continue to remain compliant. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 11:33 am
" It was given an "official" citation when it is issued. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 9:15 am
So a spy agency's cartoon depicting total world domination was an untimely public relations failure given the focus Snowden was bringing to the US surveillance state. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
The court found that the Commission had the ability to designate the building proposal as a non-farm use given the “excessive number of residential units”. [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:35 am
The Supreme Court has recently delivered an important judgment in the case of National Legal Services Authority v Union of India (NALSA). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:44 pm
This particular rationale seems hollow given the US-centric bias of existing search engines. 2) more competition is good. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 11:22 pm
But how much time are you given to find an attorney before you are given a Breathalyzer? [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 8:24 am
The Court of Appeal held: The review officer had used a checklist, on which whether MS V had done or failed to do something deliberately for the purposes of s.191. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 8:24 am
The Court of Appeal held: The review officer had used a checklist, on which whether MS V had done or failed to do something deliberately for the purposes of s.191. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
He was also given leave to amend his complaint regarding alleged strip searching and confiscation of his religious materials because of his faith.In Harris v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:47 am
Bowen v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:52 am
Earlier this year, the US Supreme Court handed down its decision in Paroline v. [read post]
