Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 4881 - 4900 of 10,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Murray, 83 A.3d 137, 155-56 (Pa. 2013) (citations and quotation marks omitted).Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am by Kelly
United States (Patently-O) CAFC finds claim construction arguments waived on appeal: Enovsys LLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 6:50 am by Quinta Jurecic
In terrorism news, Bobby noted the arrival of yet another material support case involving supporters of ISIS within the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held 7-2 that to convict a defendant of impeding the administration of the tax code, the government must prove that the defendant knew of or could have foreseen a tax-related proceeding. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Last week, the Court handed Riegel v Medtronic, 128 S. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:40 pm by Zachary Spilman
Nealy, 71 M.J. _ (C.A.A.F. 2012) and United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
” At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson notes that judges in several lower courts have relied on Justice Scalia’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 10:55 am by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
In her visit to Beijing, German chancellor Angela Merkel suggested that the United States and Chi [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” Leah Litman has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 10:10 am by Vanessa Sauter
Sarah Grant provided an update on the United States v. al-Nashiri proceedings. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
(IAM)   Australia FCA decision enforces trade marks over internet marketing of strata-titled property: Mantra Group Pty Ltd v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 3:36 am by Russ Bensing
The next day comes the argument in United States v. [read post]