Search for: "B. Smith" Results 4901 - 4920 of 5,332
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2008, 11:31 am
Sherman in his Texas State & Local Tax Law Blog Taxation of fuel provided to compression service operators at no cost - New Orleans lawyer Cheryl Kornick of Liskow & Lewis in the firm's Energy Law Blog A climate change policy with no teeth - Texas law professor Victor B. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:59 am
Newbill appeals his conviction, after a jury trial, on one count of rape, as a class B felony. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Attorneys' Manual cannot create substantive rights for the defendants; and 2) the district court abused its discretion when it failed to consider or allude to any prejudice caused by the government's failure to abide by District of Puerto Rico Local Rule 144.2(b). [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 7:08 am
Freshwater challenges his conviction by claiming that the trial court erred on the following grounds: (a) by admitting hearsay statements from Officer Leland Smith over Freshwater's objection; and (b) by denying Freshwater's motion for a directed verdict on the evidence as to Count 2, Residential Entry. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 5:01 pm
REV. 761 NOTES A Textual Approach to Harmonizing Sherbert and Smith on Free Exercise Nicholas J. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 7:35 am
The proposal is one of a series of measures announced by Home Secretary Jacqui Smith to make it harder for child sex offenders to meet children online. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 6:23 am
Smith, Assistant Attorney General. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
bs Act violations under a color of official right theory, it must satisfy the "property from another" and "with his consent" requirements of 18 U.S.C. section 1951(b)(2). [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 11:50 am
(B) Communications Decency Act (CDA) - Section 230(c)- Section 230(c) is an internet-specific, legislative response to case law that holds ISPs liable as publishers in online defamation actions. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
  Sections 121-1102(b) and (c) of the Act permit a limited partner who dissents from a proposed merger or consolidation to be cashed out for the "fair value" of his or her partnership interest. [read post]