Search for: "BELL v. BELL" Results 4901 - 4920 of 5,137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2023, 9:24 am by centerforartlaw
In this 1920s case, an art expert told a newspaper that a painting an owner claimed was La Belle Ferronnière was inauthentic, cratering its potential resale price, and a lawsuit was filed against the expert.[19] A more contemporary example is Thompson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:24 pm by centerforartlaw
In this 1920s case, an art expert told a newspaper that a painting an owner claimed was La Belle Ferronnière was inauthentic, cratering its potential resale price, and a lawsuit was filed against the expert.[19] A more contemporary example is Thompson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 12:58 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v]   What makes the Solarwinds attack difficult is that (1) for the most part entities allowed the updates as [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 7:46 am by Catherine Reach
Additional bells and whistles in many client portals are shared calendars, contacts, tasks, and online bill pay with outstanding invoice notifications. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Family Lawyer said in February 1971, plaintiff made application to this Court for leave to serve the defendant by publication and for permission to proceed as a poor person. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:34 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Finally, In an August 21, 2012 opinion, Central District of California Judge James V. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Background The controversy that the Supreme Court stirred up almost exactly one year ago with its ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 2:28 am by sevach
Resulta curioso que a los afectados o víctimas de tales situaciones de “indefensión” (real, nada de palabrería) les resulte políticamente incorrecto endurecer las medidas de vigilancia, sanción o penalidades, pero cambian radicalmente de parecer cuando ellos mismos son las víctimas del expolio o actuación. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:44 am by Ron Coleman
 Well, first, the standard — enunciated for the first time in DC Comics v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm by Ron Coleman
 Well, first, the standard — enunciated for the first time in DC Comics v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
Egilman was sufficiently clever to discern that if his “method” led to a conclusion that silicone gel breast implants cause autoimmune disease, but the Institute of Medicine, along with court-appointed experts, found no basis for a causal conclusion, then by modus tollens Egilman’s “method” was suspect and must be rejected.[1] This awareness likely explains the extent to which he went to cover up his involvement in the plaintiffs’ causation case in the silicone… [read post]