Search for: "Bui v. State" Results 4901 - 4920 of 8,940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am by Christa Culver
(3) Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding more generally that a state criminal law which states that no slaughterhouse may buy, sell, receive, process, butcher, or hold a nonambulatory animal is not a preempted attempt to regulate the “premises, facilities, [or] operations” of federally regulated slaughterhouses? [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 12:37 pm by admin
August 24, 2022 Practical Law Canada Competition, of which I am Lawyer Editor, published a new Legal Update that discusses the recent Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) decision in Mohr v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am by NL
Mr L argued firstly that the judge below had failed to apply the test in Kennealy v Dunne [1977] 1 QBD 837 properly.The court is required to be satisfied that the premises are reasonably required, but on the authority of Kennealy v Dunne that reasonable requirement must be something more than a desire but less than a necessity. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 6:12 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Homeland SecurityThe investigation and arrest of Prokopi is an outgrowth of the civil forfeiture case of United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:21 am by Carlos A. Kelly
In 2006, the Florida Legislature enacted several statutes in response to the United States Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:43 pm
See 58 M.J. at 397; see also United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm by Jack Pringle
Each passing year brings more appellate court decisions, at the state and federal levels, addressing arbitration. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm by Jack Pringle
Each passing year brings more appellate court decisions, at the state and federal levels, addressing arbitration. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Greenhouse writes:It has been nearly three months since the court “invited” — that is to say, ordered — Solicitor General Elena Kagan to “express the views of the United States” on whether laws that take away the right to vote from people in prison or on parole can be challenged under the Voting Rights Act as racially discriminatory.The order came in a case from Massachusetts, Simmons v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:08 am by Amy Howe
   That is the question before the Court this morning in Bond v. [read post]