Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 14,932
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2019, 4:44 pm
The ICC giving into the political influence of states is clearly an issue in the Afghanistan example, given that the investigation was halted due to a lack of support from the United States. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm
We also do not know how Justice Alito or Chief Justice Roberts voted in Murphy. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm
We also do not know how Justice Alito or Chief Justice Roberts voted in Murphy. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
United States, a Clean Water Act case that “would clarify the incoherence of the government’s definition of ‘navigable waters,’ while serving to restrain regulatory agencies from further vindictive actions against property owners. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 2:52 pm
On Monday, March 25, 2019, the United States Supreme Court held oral argument on Dutra Group v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
With respect to the applicability of the Constitution, Dixon cited Justice Anthony Kennedy’s concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:40 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices French, Fischer, DeWine, and O’Donnell* *Then-Justice O’Donnell would only accept on proposition of Law No.1 No: Justice Kennedy and DeGenaro Key Statutes and Precedent R.C. 124.27(B) (The Probation Statute) (Appointments in classified civil service shall be for a probationary period. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am
United States (2000), Rehnquist declined to expressly overrule Miranda v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:57 am
” Chief Justice Earl Warren asked why the Virginia statute did not apply to “North American Indians. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 3:53 am
The Court was also “troubled” that defendants were offering to sell contact lenses into the United States using Mon Ros’ AZURE and AMARILLO marks. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 1:22 pm
Joan Biskupic says her fourth book about a member of the United States Supreme Court involved “my most difficult subject” – Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
The PEW Research Group’s surveys of public opinion in the United States document the fundamental regime change that has taken place over the last half century. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:31 am
Kopf Senior United States District Jud [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
” One might compare this, ruefully, with the fact that not only Holder, but also his boss, the former President of the Harvard Law Review and a former member of the University of Chicago Law School faculty, never once offered an interesting observation about the United States Constitution and the vision presumably underlying it nor indicated any deep interest in molding the federal judiciary through judicial appointments. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
He also threatened to join talks between Kosovo and Serbia if the United States joins. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 4:08 am
Jeong says it’s not going to happen in the United States, even as it’s happening in Europe already, where there is no First Amendment equivalent. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 11:18 pm
” NCOIL noted that it would soon be deciding the role the organization “would take in alerting state Chief Justices, state legislative leaders and members of the committees with jurisdiction over insurance public policy [and] state insurance regulators” that the Restatement was “in numerous places, a misstatement of the law . . . and should not be afforded recognition as an authoritative reference. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 11:18 pm
” NCOIL noted that it would soon be deciding the role the organization “would take in alerting state Chief Justices, state legislative leaders and members of the committees with jurisdiction over insurance public policy [and] state insurance regulators” that the Restatement was “in numerous places, a misstatement of the law . . . and should not be afforded recognition as an authoritative reference. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 11:18 pm
” NCOIL noted that it would soon be deciding the role the organization “would take in alerting state Chief Justices, state legislative leaders and members of the committees with jurisdiction over insurance public policy [and] state insurance regulators” that the Restatement was “in numerous places, a misstatement of the law . . . and should not be afforded recognition as an authoritative reference. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:29 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
