Search for: "Deter v. Deter" Results 4901 - 4920 of 5,291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
These processes and are currently being utilized on a grand scale by groups referred to as “copyright trolls” (“troll”).v Unlike the prototypical ‘content owners versus file sharer’ battle that has heretofore been pursued, this revived model brings a new third party to the bargaining table. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am by Marty Lederman
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 8:20 am by Eugene Volokh
"[V]igorous participation in athletic activities" would be deterred. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 5:12 pm by Aaron Moss
Ironically, that’s the one defense that, per the Supreme Court’s recent pronouncement in Google v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 4:42 pm by Bona Law PC
Last but not least, FTC recently voted to rescind a 1995 policy statement that made it more difficult and burdensome to deter problematic mergers and acquisitions. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
(5) A discussion of specific policy recommendations to deter the activities of notorious foreign infringers and encourage foreign businesses industry norms that promote the protection of intellectual property globally, including addressing— (A) whether notorious foreign infringers that engage in significant infringing should be prohibited by the laws of the States from seeking to raise capital United States, including offering stock to the public; and (B) whether the United States… [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm by Jesse Peters
  The ICJ Order in South Africa v Israel On 26 January 2024, the ICJ delivered its landmark Order indicating provisional measures in South Africa v Israel. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
As the Divisional Court recently said in Bishop v. [read post]