Search for: "Ex Parte Clear"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 5,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Griffith, No. 07-50531 Defendants' sentences imposed on remand for their participation in a conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine are affirmed where: 1) under the mandate rule, defendants waived various objections regarding certain defendants' requests for a decrease for minimal or minor participant; 2) the district court erroneously concluded that the mandate rule precluded other defendants from raising objections to their conspiracy sentences for minor or minimal participation; but 3)… [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 3:07 pm
Does 1-22, where the judges recognized that these proceedings should not be ex parte. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 11:17 am
She also sought to invalidate defendant/ex-husband's transfer to a third part for his share of the marital residence.As to the issue of medical expenses, the parties were required per their Judgment of Divorce to equally share in these costs. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:36 pm
Product safety and product testing must be an integral part of any supplier or manufacturing contract. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:12 pm
As ex-plained in Part I.A., various jurisdictions have insisted that the amount of punitive damages be tethered tightly to the amount of compensatory damages awarded. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Louisiana, No. 06-10119 A Louisiana conviction for first-degree murder and death sentence is reversed where the trial judge committed clear error in its ruling on an objection to the prosecution's strike of a black juror during voir dire, in violation of Batson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 2:40 am
For example, let’s assume that your intuition regarding your ex-employee’s dishonesty is accurate. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz),US: Two remaining challenged WARF embryonic stem cell patents upheld in ex parte reexamination: (Holman's Biotech IP Blog), Pharma & Biotech - ProductsAricept (Donepezil) – USV wins appeal against USPTO decision: (Spicy IP),Celerex (Celecoxib) – CAFC decision in Celebrex patents dispute between Pfizer and Teva will cut patent term by one and a half years: (Patent Baristas), Inersan – Ranbaxy in-licenses Inersan to CD Pharma to… [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 2:17 am
This is pretty clear from Howard's remarks. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:23 am
The abstract reads:"A dynamic link library (DLL) in a computing device is provided in the form of a first part and an extension part. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:27 am
Ex Rel. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
Moreover, their brief goes on, Article VII was only a part of a larger movement to vindicate the supremacy of Parliament. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:01 pm
LVSun 3/14/08 Man cleared by insanity defense facew new hearing. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
GENERAL PROVISIONS 10.0 APPLICABILITY OF RULES (a) Applicability of Rules (b) Rules of Construction (c) Jurisdiction 10.1 EXCUSE FROM COMPLIANCE 10.2 PROBATE COURT INFORMATION (a) District Courts Hearing Probate Matters (b) Addresses and Telephone Numbers and Calendaring Information 10.3 PROBATE ATTORNEY'S NOTES (a) Probate Notes Available on the Web (b) Clearing Probate Notes (c) Updated Probate Notes (d) Failure to Clear Probate Notes 10.4 PROBATE NOTE… [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Phillips, No. 07-0522 Grant of habeas petition ordering conviction be vacated based on state's Brady violation is vacated in part as to barring of retrial of count of depraved indifference murder as petitioner had not exhausted his state remedies with respect to that relief. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:44 am
CA found that it was not entirely clear whether TC based its award of attorney fees under KRS 403.220 on the financial resources of the parties as well as Ex-Husband's obstructive tactics. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 4:49 am
Sponsor: Rep Miller, George [CA-7] (introduced 11/9/2007) Cosponsors (29)PART A--PART A AMENDMENTSSEC. 401. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:42 am
” Ex. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
The Guidance makes this clear. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 3:09 pm
The hearing on the Fee Committee’s proposal lasted twenty minutes and was ex parte. [read post]
