Search for: "Howes v. Fields" Results 4901 - 4920 of 8,969
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2015, 3:30 pm by D. Daxton White
Usually they are sold talking about a track record, “hey look how great this has done in the past. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 12:47 am by Sander van Rijnswou
The current status of the file is a deemed withdrawal, more than 18 years after the priority date.Summary of Facts and Submissions(...)V. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:12 am by Ross Schulman
It’s a situation that echoes EFF’s founding case over 30 years ago, Steve Jackson Games v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Meanwhile, the Channel 4 documentary, ‘Sri Lanka’s Killing Fields’, was cleared of containing misleading material and found not to breached the code on impartiality and offensiveness. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:24 pm
Nothing defines how something looks by how it's described. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 10:02 pm by Liz Bradshaw
Notes from the Field: Increase in Vibrio parahaemolyticus Infections Associated with Consumption of Atlantic Coast Shellfish – 2013. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:39 am by John Elwood
Fields, 11-561, involving an Eighth Amendment challenge to a Wisconsin law prohibiting prisoner sex changes. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Take us away from the metaphor of war we’ve worked with in the © field for so long. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am by John Collins
The case also provides a useful comparator for the England and Wales Court of Appeal’s judgment on 13 October 2016 in Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) & Ors [2016] EWCA Civ 1006 (EWCA Judgment) (covered by Brian Cordery of Bristows  in ‘Pain and Plausibility – the Lyrica Appeal’), particularly with respect to how Australian and English law determine sufficiency and infringement of Swiss-style claims. [read post]
The three questions on how to address equivalents were set out by Lord Neuberger in Actavis v Lilly [2017] UKSC 48: Does the variant achieve substantially the same result in substantially the same way as the invention (i.e. the inventive concept revealed by the patent)? [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:21 am by Florence Campbell Jones
Lord Reed considered the application of vicarious liability to an employee’s actions within their “field of activities”. [read post]