Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 8,219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2012, 7:56 pm
Simmons (2005), and those who rape as child (or perhaps commit any non-homicide offense) in Kennedy v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:01 pm
The 5-4 decision, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy and joined by the conservative wing of the court, rejected Mr. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:45 am
Maryland, and NLRB v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:40 am
S. ____, ____ (1991) (slip op., at ___) (Souter, J., joined by Kennedy, J., concurring); Arizona v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:54 pm
Thus, plaintiffs will be able to continue to possess animals, transport them within the state, or sell them to another party within the state without a permit. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:02 pm
Clinton (also known as M.B.Z. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:55 am
In Vartelas v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:27 am
In 2005, Albert Florence was stopped in his car by a New Jersey state trooper. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:29 am
Kennedy. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:06 am
As Kennedy put it for the Court in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 10:08 am
” Justice Kennedy said the most relevant precedent was Bell v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:39 am
The case - Florence v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:47 am
The whole "limiting principle" -- or lack thereof -- is irrelevant to the states' economic power. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:21 am
Florence v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
So yesterday the Supreme Court decided, in Florence v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:29 pm
On March 28, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Sester v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
It will lead some state courts to find their state constitutions provide more protection. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:33 am
Justice Kennedy announced the second opinion of the day, in Florence v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
"Nevertheless, I think it is safe to assume Justice Kennedy is, in fact, concerned about any holding of the Court that would imply a plenary power of Congress to require someone to affirmatively engage in a commercial transaction with a nonstate actor. [read post]
